ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2016
Efficient merging of data from multiple samples for determination of anomalous substructure.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facing the phase problem.IUCrJ · 2023Article
- Determining biomolecular structures near room temperature using X-ray crystallography: concepts, methods and future optimization.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023Article
- Application of sulfur SAD to small crystals with a large asymmetric unit and anomalous substructure.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022Article
- Making routine native SAD a reality: lessons from beamline X06DA at the Swiss Light Source.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2019Article
- Choosing your (Friedel) mates wisely: grouping data sets to improve anomalous signal.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2019Article
- A cysteine protease-like domain enhances the cytotoxic effects of theThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- Sample manipulation and data assembly for robust microcrystal synchrotron crystallography.IUCrJ · 2018Article
- Maximum-likelihood determination of anomalous substructures.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2018Article
- A Novel Approach to Data Collection for Difficult Structures: Data Management for Large Numbers of Crystals with the BLEND Software.Crystals · 2017Article
- Contemporary Use of Anomalous Diffraction in Biomolecular Structure Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Merging of data from multiple crystals has proven to be useful for determination of the anomalously scattering atomic substructure for crystals with weak anomalous scatterers (e.g. S and P) and/or poor diffraction. Strategies for merging data from many samples, which require assessment of sample isomorphism, rely on metrics of variability in unit-cell parameters, anomalous signal correlation and overall data similarity. Local scaling, anomalous signal optimization and data-set weighting, implemented in phenix.scale_and_merge, provide an efficient protocol for merging data from many samples. The protein NS1 was used in a series of trials with data collected from 28 samples for phasing by single-wavelength anomalous diffraction of the native S atoms. The local-scaling, anomalous-optimization protocol produced merged data sets with higher anomalous signal quality indicators than did standard global-scaling protocols. The local-scaled data were also more successful in substructure determination. Merged data quality was assessed for data sets where the multiplicity was reduced in either of two ways: by excluding data from individual crystals (to reduce errors owing to non-isomorphism) or by excluding the last-recorded segments of data from each crystal (to minimize the effects of radiation damage). The anomalous signal was equivalent at equivalent multiplicity for the two procedures, and structure-determination success correlated with anomalous signal metrics. The quality of the anomalous signal was strongly correlated with data multiplicity over a range of 12-fold to 150-fold multiplicity. For the NS1 data, the local-scaling and anomalous-optimization protocol handled sample non-isomorphism and radiation-induced decay equally well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.