Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26959889›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Camptothecin targets WRN protein: mechanism and relevance in clinical breast cancer.

Raghavendra A Shamanna, Huiming Lu, Deborah L Croteau, Arvind Arora, Devika Agarwal, Graham Ball, Mohammed A Aleskandarany, Ian O Ellis, Yves Pommier, Srinivasan Madhusudan and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RecQ Helicase Somatic Alterations in Cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Human RecQ Helicases in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Werner Syndrome Protein and DNA Replication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Genetics and genomics in Peru: Clinical and research perspective.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Raghavendra A ShamannaLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, Biomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Huiming LuLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, Biomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Deborah L CroteauLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, Biomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Arvind AroraAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Devika AgarwalSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Graham BallSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Mohammed A AleskandaranyAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ian O EllisAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Yves PommierDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Srinivasan MadhusudanAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Vilhelm A BohrLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, Biomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
National Institute on Aging · USUniversity of Nottingham · GBNottingham Trent University · GBNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

DNA Repair, Cell Cycle Checkpoints and Apoptosis as Targets for Anticancer DrugsZIABC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 2009 to 2025
$23.0M
DNA Topoisomerases as Target of Action of Anticancer DrugsZIABC006161 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 2009 to 2025
$16.8M
Function of RecQ helicases in genome stabilityZIAAG000726 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI BROSH, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$13.1M
The Function of Werner Syndrome ProteinZIAAG000721 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI FERRUCCI, LUIGI · 2009 to 2022
$7.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Werner syndrome protein (WRN) is a RecQ helicase that participates in DNA repair, genome stability and cellular senescence. The five human RecQ helicases, RECQL1, Bloom, WRN, RECQL4 and RECQL5 play critical roles in DNA repair and cell survival after treatment with the anticancer drug camptothecin (CPT). CPT derivatives are widely used in cancer chemotherapy to inhibit topoisomerase I and generate DNA double-strand breaks during replication. Here we studied the effects of CPT on the stability and expression dynamics of human RecQ helicases. In the cells treated with CPT, we observed distinct effects on WRN compared to other human RecQ helicases. CPT altered the cellular localization of WRN and induced its degradation by a ubiquitin-mediated proteasome pathway. WRN knockdown cells as well as CPT treated cells became senescent and stained positive for senescence-associated β-galactosidase at a higher frequency compared to control cells. However, the senescent phenotype was attenuated by ectopic expression of WRN suggesting functional implication of WRN degradation in CPT treated cells. Approximately 5-23% of breast cancer tumors are known to respond to CPT-based chemotherapy. Interestingly, we found that the extent of CPT-induced WRN degradation correlates with increasing sensitivity of breast cancer cells to CPT. The abundance of WRN decreased in CPT-treated sensitive cells; however, WRN remained relatively stable in CPT-resistant breast cancer cells. In a large clinical cohort of breast cancer patients, we find that WRN and topoisomerase I expression correlate with an aggressive tumor phenotype and poor prognosis. Our novel observations suggest that WRN abundance along with CPT-induced degradation could be a promising strategy for personalizing CPT-based cancer chemotherapeutic regimens.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicApoptosisBreast NeoplasmsCamptothecinCell ProliferationDNA Topoisomerases, Type IFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisSurvival RateTumor Cells, CulturedWerner Syndrome HelicaseAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinDNA Topoisomerases, Type ITOP1 protein, humanWerner Syndrome HelicaseWRN protein, humanbreast cancercamptothecinhelicasetopoisomerase IWerner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID26959889
PMCPMC4924640
OpenAlexW2293960364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.