Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26959762›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2016

Immortalized Mouse Achilles Tenocytes Demonstrate Long-Term Proliferative Capacity While Retaining Tenogenic Properties.

Sahitya K Denduluri, Bryan Scott, Joseph D Lamplot, Liangjun Yin, Zhengjian Yan, Zhongliang Wang, Jixing Ye, Jing Wang, Qiang Wei, Maryam K Mohammed and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Immortalization Reversibility in the Context of Cell Therapy Biosafety.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sahitya K Denduluri1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Bryan Scott1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Joseph D Lamplot1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Liangjun Yin1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Zhengjian Yan1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Zhongliang Wang1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Jixing Ye1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Jing Wang1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Qiang Wei1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Maryam K Mohammed1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Rex C Haydon1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Richard W Kang1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Tong-Chuan He1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Aravind Athiviraham1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Sherwin H Ho1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.
Lewis L Shi1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
Center for Herbal Research on Colorectal CancerP01AT004418 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI YUAN, CHUN-SU · 2008 to 2012
$5.9M
BMP6-Mediated OsteogenesisK08AR050142 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HAYDON, REX C · 2004 to 2008
$596k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NCCIH NIH HHS AT004418NIAMS NIH HHS AR50142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the cellular processes underlying tendon healing can allow researchers to improve long-term outcomes after injury. However, conducting meaningful studies to uncover the injury healing mechanism at cellular and molecular levels remains challenging. This is due to the inherent difficulty in isolating, culturing, and expanding sufficient primary tenocytes, due to their limited proliferative capacity and short lifespan. In this study, we sought to establish a novel line of immortalized mouse Achilles tenocytes (iMATs) with primary tenocyte properties, but increased proliferative capacity suitable for extensive in vitro experimentation. We show that isolated primary mouse Achilles tenocytes (pMATs) can be effectively immortalized using a piggyBac transposon expressing SV40 large T antigen flanked by FLP recombination target site (FRT). The resulting iMATs exhibit markedly greater proliferation and survival, which can be reversed with FLP recombinase. Furthermore, iMATs express the same set of tendon-specific markers as that of primary cells, although in lower levels, and respond similarly to exogenous stimulation with bone morphogenetic protein 13 (BMP13) as has been previously reported with pMATs. Taken together, our results suggest that iMATs acquire long-term proliferative capacity while maintaining tenogenic properties. We believe that iMATs are a suitable model for studying not only the native cellular processes involved in injury and healing, but also potential therapeutic agents that may augment the stability of tendon repair.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonAnimalsAntigens, Polyomavirus TransformingBiomarkersBone Morphogenetic ProteinsCell Line, TransformedCell ProliferationCell ShapeCell SurvivalDNA NucleotidyltransferasesHEK293 CellsHumansMiceNIH 3T3 CellsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTenocytesAntigens, Polyomavirus TransformingBiomarkersBone Morphogenetic ProteinsDNA NucleotidyltransferasesFLP recombinase

Identifiers

PMID26959762
PMCPMC4782028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.