Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26959111›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Knock-down of Hdj2/DNAJA1 co-chaperone results in an unexpected burst of tumorigenicity of C6 glioblastoma cells.

Darya A Meshalkina, Maxim A Shevtsov, Anatoliy V Dobrodumov, Elena Y Komarova, Irina V Voronkina, Vladimir F Lazarev, Boris A Margulis, Irina V Guzhova

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. DNAJA: emerging targets for anti-tumor therapy.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Heat Shock Proteins in Glioblastoma Biology: Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Darya A MeshalkinaInstitute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia.
Maxim A ShevtsovInstitute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia.
Anatoliy V DobrodumovInstitute of Macromolecular Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.
Elena Y KomarovaInstitute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia.
Irina V VoronkinaInstitute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia.
Vladimir F LazarevInstitute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia.
Boris A MargulisInstitute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia.
Irina V GuzhovaInstitute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia.
Institute of Cytology · RUFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RUInstitute of Macromolecular Compounds · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chaperone system based on Hsp70 and proteins of the DnaJ family is known to protect tumor cells from a variety of cytotoxic factors, including anti-tumor therapy. To analyze whether this also functions in a highly malignant brain tumor, we knocked down the expression of Hsp70 (HSPA1A) and its two most abundant co-chaperones, Hdj1 (DNAJB1) and Hdj2 (DNAJA1) in a C6 rat glioblastoma cell line. As expected, tumor depletion of Hsp70 caused a substantial reduction in its growth rate and increased the survival of tumor-bearing animals, whereas the reduction of Hdj1 expression had no effect. Unexpectedly, a reduction in the expression of Hdj2 led to the enhanced aggressiveness of the C6 tumor, demonstrated by its rapid growth, metastasis formation and a 1.5-fold reduction in the lifespan of tumor-bearing animals. The in vitro reduction of Hdj2 expression reduced spheroid density and simultaneously enhanced the migration and invasion of C6 cells. At the molecular level, a knock-down of Hdj2 led to the relocation of N-cadherin and the enhanced activity of metalloproteinases 1, 2, 8 and 9, which are markers of highly malignant cancer cells. The changes in the actin cytoskeleton in Hdj2-depleted cells indicate that the protein is also important for prevention of the amoeboid-like transition of tumor cells. The results of this study uncover a completely new role for the Hdj2 co-chaperone in tumorigenicity and suggest that the protein is a potential drug target.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationGene Knockdown TechniquesGlioblastomaHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessRatsRats, WistarHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHspa1a protein, ratglioblastomaHdj2Hsp70metastasestumorigenicity

Identifiers

PMID26959111
PMCPMC5008343
OpenAlexW2303189942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.