Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26959061›Full record

ReviewToxins2016

Conversion Ratio between Botox®, Dysport®, and Xeomin® in Clinical Practice.

Francesco Scaglione

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04794504 (Botulinum Toxin Type A Injected Into the Temporalis and Masseter Before Orthognathic Surgery to Improve Postoperative Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04794504 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Botulinum Toxin Type A Injected Into the Temporalis and Masseter Before Orthognathic Surgery to Improve Postoperative Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorKingsway Oral & Maxillofacial SurgeryRan2021 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsBotox 100 UNT Injection, 0.9% Saline Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Sensorimotor Perceptive Rehabilitation Integrated (SPRInt) program: exercises with augmented movement feedback associated to botulinum neurotoxin in idiopathic cervical dystonia-an observational study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Trial
  16. Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Spasticity Caused by Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Francesco ScaglioneDepartment of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, University of Milan, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129 Milan, Italy. francesco.scaglione@unimi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin has revolutionized the treatment of spasticity and is now administered worldwide. There are currently three leading botulinum neurotoxin type A products available in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinum toxin-A (ONA) Botox(®), abobotulinum toxin-A (ABO), Dysport(®), and incobotulinum toxin A (INCO, Xeomin(®)). Although the efficacies are similar, there is an intense debate regarding the comparability of various preparations. Here we will address the clinical issues of potency and conversion ratios, as well as safety issues such as toxin spread and immunogenicity, to provide guidance for BoNT-A use in clinical practice. INCO was shown to be as effective as ONA with a comparable adverse event profile when a clinical conversion ratio of 1:1 was used. The available clinical and preclinical data suggest that a conversion ratio ABO:ONA of 3:1-or even lower-could be appropriate for treating spasticity, cervical dystonia, and blepharospasm or hemifacial spasm. A higher conversion ratio may lead to an overdosing of ABO. While uncommon, distant spread may occur; however, several factors other than the pharmaceutical preparation are thought to affect spread. Finally, whereas the three products have similar efficacy when properly dosed, ABO has a better cost-efficacy profile.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular AgentsAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsAnimalsDystonic DisordersHumansMuscle SpasticityNeurotoxinsabobotulinumtoxinAAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsBotulinum Toxins, Type AincobotulinumtoxinANeuromuscular AgentsNeurotoxinsabobotulinum toxin-Abotulinum neurotoxinincobotulinum toxin Aonabotulinum toxin-A

Identifiers

PMID26959061
PMCPMC4810210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.