Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26959055›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2016

Nutrition and Dementia: Evidence for Preventive Approaches?

Marco Canevelli, Flaminia Lucchini, Federica Quarata, Giuseppe Bruno, Matteo Cesari

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Regulation of autophagy-mediated pathways by diet, physical activity, and sleep in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Focused Review on Cognitive Improvement by the GenusPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Metabolomics in aging research: aging markers from organs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco CanevelliDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, "Sapienza" University, Rome 00185, Italy. marco.canevelli@gmail.com.
Flaminia LucchiniDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, "Sapienza" University, Rome 00185, Italy. flaminialucchini@hotmail.it.
Federica QuarataDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, "Sapienza" University, Rome 00185, Italy. federica.quarata@libero.it.
Giuseppe BrunoDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, "Sapienza" University, Rome 00185, Italy. giuseppe.bruno@uniroma1.it.
Matteo CesariGérontopôle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse 31062, France. macesari@gmail.com.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the possibility of favorably influencing the cognitive trajectory through promotion of lifestyle modifications has been increasingly investigated. In particular, the relationship between nutritional habits and cognitive health has attracted special attention. The present review is designed to retrieve and discuss recent evidence (published over the last 3 years) coming from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of nutritional interventions aimed at improving cognitive functioning and/or preventing cognitive decline in non-demented older individuals. A systematic review of literature was conducted, leading to the identification of 11 studies of interest. Overall, most of the nutritional interventions tested by the selected RCTs were found to produce statistically significant cognitive benefits (defined as improved neuropsychological test scores). Nevertheless, the clinical meaningfulness of such findings was not adequately discussed and appears controversial. In parallel, only 2 studies investigated between-group differences concerning incident dementia and mild cognitive impairment cases, reporting conflicting results. Results of the present review suggest that several dietary patterns and nutritional components may constitute promising strategies in postponing, slowing, and preventing cognitive decline. However, supporting evidence is overall weak and further studies are needed.

Indexed as

CognitionDietDietary SupplementsNutritional StatusRisk Reduction BehaviorAgedCognition DisordersDementiaFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtective FactorsRecovery of FunctionRisk Assessmentcognitive disordersdementiadietnutritionpreventive strategiesrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID26959055
PMCPMC4808873
OpenAlexW2289817584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.