Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26958843›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Selection of a Relevant In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Model to Investigate Pro-Metastatic Features of Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines.

Aurore Drolez, Elodie Vandenhaute, Sylvain Julien, Fabien Gosselet, Joy Burchell, Roméo Cecchelli, Philippe Delannoy, Marie-Pierre Dehouck, Caroline Mysiorek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Biomimetic Human Multi-Cellular In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A silicon nanomembrane platform for the visualization of immune cell trafficking across the human blood-brain barrier under flow.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aurore DrolezUniversité d'Artois (UArtois), EA2465, LBHE, Lens, F-62307, France.
Elodie VandenhauteUniversité d'Artois (UArtois), EA2465, LBHE, Lens, F-62307, France.
Sylvain JulienStructural and Functional Glycobiology Unit, UMR CNRS 8576, University of Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Fabien GosseletUniversité d'Artois (UArtois), EA2465, LBHE, Lens, F-62307, France.
Joy BurchellResearch Oncology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Roméo CecchelliUniversité d'Artois (UArtois), EA2465, LBHE, Lens, F-62307, France.
Philippe DelannoyStructural and Functional Glycobiology Unit, UMR CNRS 8576, University of Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Marie-Pierre DehouckUniversité d'Artois (UArtois), EA2465, LBHE, Lens, F-62307, France.
Caroline MysiorekUniversité d'Artois (UArtois), EA2465, LBHE, Lens, F-62307, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 7-17% of metastatic breast cancer patients will develop brain metastases, associated with a poor prognosis. To reach the brain parenchyma, cancer cells need to cross the highly restrictive endothelium of the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB). As treatments for brain metastases are mostly inefficient, preventing cancer cells to reach the brain could provide a relevant and important strategy. For that purpose an in vitro approach is required to identify cellular and molecular interaction mechanisms between breast cancer cells and BBB endothelium, notably at the early steps of the interaction. However, while numerous studies are performed with in vitro models, the heterogeneity and the quality of BBB models used is a limitation to the extrapolation of the obtained results to in vivo context, showing that the choice of a model that fulfills the biological BBB characteristics is essential. Therefore, we compared pre-established and currently used in vitro models from different origins (bovine, mice, human) in order to define the most appropriate tool to study interactions between breast cancer cells and the BBB. On each model, the BBB properties and the adhesion capacities of breast cancer cell lines were evaluated. As endothelial cells represent the physical restriction site of the BBB, all the models consisted of endothelial cells from animal or human origins. Among these models, only the in vitro BBB model derived from human stem cells both displayed BBB properties and allowed measurement of meaningful different interaction capacities of the cancer cell lines. Importantly, the measured adhesion and transmigration were found to be in accordance with the cancer cell lines molecular subtypes. In addition, at a molecular level, the inhibition of ganglioside biosynthesis highlights the potential role of glycosylation in breast cancer cells adhesion capacities.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CD34Blood-Brain BarrierBreast NeoplasmsCattleCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedFemaleFetal BloodHumansMiceNeurogliaPericytesRatsAntigens, CD34

Identifiers

PMID26958843
PMCPMC4784983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.