Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26958810›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Repeated observation of immune gene sets enrichment in women with non-small cell lung cancer.

Jhajaira M Araujo, Alexandra Prado, Nadezhda K Cardenas, Mayer Zaharia, Richard Dyer, Franco Doimi, Leny Bravo, Luis Pinillos, Zaida Morante, Alfredo Aguilar and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Gender Differences and Immunotherapy Outcome in Advanced Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex differences in cancer mechanisms.Biology of sex differences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jhajaira M AraujoUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Alexandra PradoUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Nadezhda K CardenasEscuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Chorrillos, Lima 09, Peru.
Mayer ZahariaUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Richard DyerDepartamento de Patología, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Franco DoimiDepartamento de Patología, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Leny BravoEscuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Chorrillos, Lima 09, Peru.
Luis PinillosUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Zaida MoranteDepartamento de Medicina Oncológica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Surquillo, Lima 41, Peru.
Alfredo AguilarUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Luis A MasUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Henry L GomezUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Carlos S VallejosUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
Christian RolfoPhase I - Early Clinical Trials Unit, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
Joseph A PintoUnidad de Investigación Básica y Traslacional, Oncosalud-AUNA, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru.
EsSALUD · PEUniversidad Privada San Juan Bautista · PEAntwerp University Hospital · BEInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are different biological and clinical patterns of lung cancer between genders indicating intrinsic differences leading to increased sensitivity to cigarette smoke-induced DNA damage, mutational patterns of KRAS and better clinical outcomes in women while differences between genders at gene-expression levels was not previously reported. Here we show an enrichment of immune genes in NSCLC in women compared to men. We found in a GSEA analysis (by biological processes annotated from Gene Ontology) of six public datasets a repeated observation of immune gene sets enrichment in women. "Immune system process", "immune response", "defense response", "cellular defense response" and "regulation of immune system process" were the gene sets most over-represented while APOBEC3G, APOBEC3F, LAT, CD1D and CCL5 represented the top-five core genes. Characterization of immune cell composition with the platform CIBERSORT showed no differences between genders; however, there were differences when tumor tissues were compared to normal tissues. Our results suggest different immune responses in NSCLC between genders that could be related with the different clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleBiomarkers, TumorCIBERSORTgenderGSEAimmune gene setsnon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID26958810
PMCPMC4991454
OpenAlexW2295152675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.