Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26958314›Full record

ArticleCartilage2016

Osteochondral Biopsy Analysis Demonstrates That BST-CarGel Treatment Improves Structural and Cellular Characteristics of Cartilage Repair Tissue Compared With Microfracture.

Stéphane Méthot, Adele Changoor, Nicolas Tran-Khanh, Caroline D Hoemann, William D Stanish, Alberto Restrepo, Matthew S Shive, Michael D Buschmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. [Treatment of cartilage defects of the knee].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stéphane MéthotBio-Orthopaedics Division, Piramal Life Sciences, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Adele ChangoorInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nicolas Tran-KhanhDepartment of Chemical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Caroline D HoemannInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Chemical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
William D StanishDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Alberto RestrepoBio-Orthopaedics Division, Piramal Life Sciences, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Matthew S ShiveBio-Orthopaedics Division, Piramal Life Sciences, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Michael D BuschmannInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Chemical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe efficacy and safety of BST-CarGel, a chitosan-based medical device for cartilage repair, was compared with microfracture alone at 1 year during a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the knee. The quality of repair tissue of osteochondral biopsies collected from a subset of patients was compared using blinded histological assessments.

methodsThe international RCT evaluated repair tissue quantity and quality by 3-dimensional quantitative magnetic resonance imaging as co-primary endpoints at 12 months. At an average of 13 months posttreatment, 21/41 BST-CarGel and 17/39 microfracture patients underwent elective second look arthroscopies as a tertiary endpoint, during which ICRS (International Cartilage Repair Society) macroscopic scoring was carried out, and osteochondral biopsies were collected. Stained histological sections were evaluated by blinded readers using ICRS I and II histological scoring systems. Collagen organization was evaluated using a polarized light microscopy score.

resultsBST-CarGel treatment resulted in significantly better ICRS macroscopic scores (P = 0.0002) compared with microfracture alone, indicating better filling, integration, and tissue appearance. Histologically, BST-CarGel resulted in a significant improvement of structural parameters-Surface Architecture (P = 0.007) and Surface/Superficial Assessment (P = 0.042)-as well as cellular parameters-Cell Viability (P = 0.006) and Cell Distribution (P = 0.032). No histological parameters were significantly better for the microfracture group. BST-CarGel treatment also resulted in a more organized repair tissue with collagen stratification more similar to native hyaline cartilage, as measured by polarized light microscopy scoring (P = 0.0003).

conclusionMultiple and independent analyses in this biopsy substudy demonstrated that BST-CarGel treatment results in improved structural and cellular characteristics of repair tissue at 1 year posttreatment compared with microfracture alone, supporting previously reported results by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Indexed as

biopsycartilage repaircollagen organizationhistology: scoring systemspolarized light microscopy

Identifiers

PMID26958314
PMCPMC4749746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.