Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26958312›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2015

Automated Extraction of Substance Use Information from Clinical Texts.

Yan Wang, Elizabeth S Chen, Serguei Pakhomov, Elliot Arsoniadis, Elizabeth W Carter, Elizabeth Lindemann, Indra Neil Sarkar, Genevieve B Melton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Synth-SBDH: A Synthetic Dataset of Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health for Clinical Text.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The 2022 n2c2/UW shared task on extracting social determinants of health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  14. Capturing Individual-level Social Determinants from Clinical Text.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. An Investigation of the Representation of Social Determinants of Health in the UMLS.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan WangInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Elizabeth S ChenCenter for Clinical & Translational Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Serguei PakhomovInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Elliot ArsoniadisInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Elizabeth W CarterCenter for Clinical & Translational Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Elizabeth LindemannInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Indra Neil SarkarCenter for Clinical & Translational Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Genevieve B MeltonInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
Natural language processing for clinical and translational researchR01GM102282 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, PAKHOMOV, SERGUEI VS · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
Leveraging the EHR to Collect and Analyze Social, Behavioral & Familial FactorsR01LM011364 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI CHEN, ELIZABETH S., MELTON-MEAUX, GENEVIEVE B · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102282NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within clinical discourse, social history (SH) includes important information about substance use (alcohol, drug, and nicotine use) as key risk factors for disease, disability, and mortality. In this study, we developed and evaluated a natural language processing (NLP) system for automated detection of substance use statements and extraction of substance use attributes (e.g., temporal and status) based on Stanford Typed Dependencies. The developed NLP system leveraged linguistic resources and domain knowledge from a multi-site social history study, Propbank and the MiPACQ corpus. The system attained F-scores of 89.8, 84.6 and 89.4 respectively for alcohol, drug, and nicotine use statement detection, as well as average F-scores of 82.1, 90.3, 80.8, 88.7, 96.6, and 74.5 respectively for extraction of attributes. Our results suggest that NLP systems can achieve good performance when augmented with linguistic resources and domain knowledge when applied to a wide breadth of substance use free text clinical notes.

Indexed as

AutomationLinguisticsNatural Language ProcessingSubstance-Related DisordersHumansPattern Recognition, Automated

Identifiers

PMID26958312
PMCPMC4765598
OpenAlexW2424055918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.