ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2015
Improving Continuity of Care via the Discharge Summary.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Healthcare for people with rare diseases: recommendations for successful intersectoral collaboration].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Article
- Indicators of missing Electronic Medical Record (EMR) discharge summaries: A retrospective study on Canadian data.International journal of population data science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discharge summaries (DCS) frequently fail to improve the continuity of care. A chart review of 188 DCS was performed to identify specific components that could be improved through health information technology. Medication reconciliations were analyzed for completeness and for medical reasoning. Documentation of pending results and follow-up details were analyzed. Patient preferences, patient goals, and the handover tone were noted. Patients were discharged on an average of 9.8 medications, only 3% of medication reconciliations were complete and medical reasoning was frequently absent. There were 358 pending results in 188 hospital discharges though only 14% were mentioned in the DCS. Documentation of clear, timely follow-up was present for less than 50% of patients. Patient preferences, patient goals, and lessons learned were rarely included. A handover tone was in only 17% of the DCS. Evaluating the DCS as a clinical handover is novel but information for safe handovers is frequently missing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26958250PMC4765640W2320279958What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.