Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26958080›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2016

Cutaneous stimulation at the ankle: a differential effect on proprioceptive postural control according to the participants' preferred sensory strategy.

Sébastien Pavailler, Frédérique Hintzy, Nicolas Horvais, Nicolas Forestier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sébastien PavaillerLaboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, Université de Savoie, UFR SceM - Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac, France ; Salomon SAS, Amer Sports Footwear Innovation and Sport Science Lab, 14 chemin des Croiselets, 74996 Annecy, Cedex 9 France.
Frédérique HintzyLaboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, Université de Savoie, UFR SceM - Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac, France.
Nicolas HorvaisLaboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, Université de Savoie, UFR SceM - Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac, France ; Salomon SAS, Amer Sports Footwear Innovation and Sport Science Lab, 14 chemin des Croiselets, 74996 Annecy, Cedex 9 France.
Nicolas ForestierLaboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, Université de Savoie, UFR SceM - Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnkle movements can be partially encoded by cutaneous afferents. However, little is known about the central integration of these cutaneous signals, and whether individual differences exist in this integration. The aim of this study was to determine whether the effect of cutaneous stimulation at the ankle would differ depending on the participants' preferred sensory strategy appraised by relative proprioceptive weighting (RPw).

methodsForty-seven active young individuals free of lower-limb injury stood on a force platform either barefoot or wearing a custom-designed bootee. Vibrations (60 Hz, 0.5 mm) were applied either to the peroneal tendons or to the lumbar paraspinal muscles.

resultsThe barefoot RPw was strongly negatively correlated to the absolute change in RPw measured in the bootee condition (r = -0.81, P < 0.001). Participants were then grouped depending on their barefoot RPw value. The RPw was significantly higher in the bootee condition than in the barefoot condition only for participants with low barefoot RPw.

conclusionsThe external cutaneous stimulation given by the bootee increased the weight of ankle proprioceptive signals only for participants with low barefoot RPw. This result confirmed that optimization of the ankle proprioceptive signals provided by cutaneous afferent stimulation has a differential effect depending on the participants' preferred sensory strategy.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationShoesAdultAnkleFemaleHumansMaleParaspinal MusclesProprioceptionTendonsVibrationFunctional testRelative proprioceptive weightingVibration

Identifiers

PMID26958080
PMCPMC4782337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.