Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26958046›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2015

Comparison of open surgical discectomy versus plasma-laser nucleoplasty in patients with single lumbar disc herniation.

Saeid Abrishamkar, Masih Kouchakzadeh, Ahmad Mirhosseini, Homayoun Tabesh, Majid Rezvani, Amir Moayednia, Babak Ganjeifar, Amir Mahabadi, Elham Yousefi, Ali Mehrabi Kooshki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Efficacy of Single Level Versus Double Levels Surgery of Percutaneous Disc Nucleoplasty (PDN) Approach in Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Electromyography activities in patients with lower lumbar disc herniation.Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saeid AbrishamkarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Masih KouchakzadehDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ahmad MirhosseiniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Homayoun TabeshDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Majid RezvaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Amir MoayedniaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Babak GanjeifarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mashhad University of Medical School, Emam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, Iran.
Amir MahabadiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Elham YousefiDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ali Mehrabi KooshkiDepartmentt of Epidemiology, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IREmam Reza Hospital · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntervertebral disc herniation is a major cause of low back pain. Several treatment methods are available for lumbar disc herniation including Chemonucleolysis, open surgery, nucleoplasty, laser disc decompression, and intradiscal electrothermal therapy. The high prevalence of lumbar disc herniation necessitates a minimally invasive yet effective treatment method. In this study, we compared the outcomes of open surgery and nucleoplasty method in patients with single lumbar disc herniation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was a noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted in one of the University Hospitals of Isfahan Medical University; The Alzahra Hospital. About 200 patients with the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation were recruited and were assigned to either the treatment or control groups using block randomization. One group received open surgery and the other group received nucleoplasty as the method of treatment. Patients were revisited at 14 days, 1, 2, 3 months, and 1-year after surgery and were assessed for the following variables: Lower back pain, lower limb pain, common complications of surgery (e.g., discitis, infection and hematoma) and recurrence of herniation.

resultsThe mean (standard deviation) severity of low back pain was reduced from 6.92 (2.5) to 3.43 (2.3) in the nucleoplasty group (P = 0.04) and from 7.5 (2.2) to 3.04 (1.61) in the discectomy group (P = 0.73). Between group difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.44), however, time and treatment interaction was significant (P = 0.001). The level of radicular pain evaluated 1 year after treatment was reduced from 8.1 (1.2) to 2.9 (1.2) (P = 0.004) and from 7.89 (2.1) to 3.6 (2.5) (P =0.04) in the discectomy and the nucleoplasty groups respectively, significant interaction between time and treatment options was observed (P < 0.001) while there was no significant difference between two treatment groups (P = 0.82).

conclusionOur results show that while nucleoplasty is as effective as open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, it is also less invasive with higher patient compliance. Taking factor such as decreased cost and duration of the surgery, as well as faster recovery in patients into account; we suggest considering nucleoplasty as an effective method of treatment in patients with single-level disc herniation.

Indexed as

Intervertebral disc herniationnucleoplastyopen discectomy

Identifiers

PMID26958046
PMCPMC4766818
OpenAlexW2239237739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.