Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26958006›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2015

"The fairer the better?" Use of potentially toxic skin bleaching products.

Elisabeth Darj, Jennifer J Infanti, Beth Maina Ahlberg, Jecinta Okumu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Glucocorticoids in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisabeth DarjWomen's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden; Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Jennifer J InfantiPublic Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Beth Maina AhlbergWomen's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Jecinta OkumuWomen's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin bleaching is a widespread phenomenon in spite of their potentially toxic health effects.

objectivesThis study aimed to determine if such products are used in Sweden in particular by pregnant women, furthermore to explore immigrant women's view skin bleaching.

methods455 pregnant women completed a questionnaire, which were statistically analysed. Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with immigrant women, content analysis was used to assess the data.

resultsSkin bleaching products were used by 2.6% of pregnant women, significantlly more by women born in non-European countries. Motivating factors were associated with the concept of beauty together with social and economic advantages. The women had low awareness of the potential health risks of the products. Regulations on the trade of skin bleaching products have not effectively reduced the availability of the products in Sweden nor the popularity of skin bleaching.

conclusionThere is need for further research especially among pregnant women and possible effects on newborns. Products should be tested for toxicity. Public health information should be developed and health care providers educated and aware of this practice, due to their potential negative health implications.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAsian PeopleBlack PeopleEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchSkin Lightening PreparationsSkin PigmentationSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenSkin Lightening Preparationsharmful practicepregnancySkin bleaching

Identifiers

PMID26958006
PMCPMC4765398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.