Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26957792›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Comparative study of fluoride released and recharged from conventional pit and fissure sealants versus surface prereacted glass ionomer technology.

Elias Nahum Salmerón-Valdés, Rogelio J Scougall-Vilchis, Jorge Alanis-Tavira, Raúl Alberto Morales-Luckie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elias Nahum Salmerón-ValdésDental Research Center "Dr. Keisaburo Miyata", School of Dentistry, Autonomus University State of Mexico, Toluca, México.
Rogelio J Scougall-VilchisDental Research Center "Dr. Keisaburo Miyata", School of Dentistry, Autonomus University State of Mexico, Toluca, México.
Jorge Alanis-TaviraDental Research Center "Dr. Keisaburo Miyata", School of Dentistry, Autonomus University State of Mexico, Toluca, México.
Raúl Alberto Morales-LuckieSustainable Chemical Research Center, School of Chemistry, Autonomus University State of Mexico, Toluca, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe fluoride release of sealants in vitro shows a marked decrease. Giomers are distinguishable from manufactured resin-based sealants and contain prereacted glass-ionomer particles (PRG).

aimsTo compare the amounts of fluoride released from the main pit and fissure of a resin-based sealant with that from a Giomer and to assess the abilities of the sealant and the Giomer to recharge when exposed to regular use of fluoride rinse. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe readings for the fluoride concentration were carried out for 60 days using a fluoride ion-specific electrode. After this period, the samples were recharged using a fluoride mouth rinse. The amount of fluoride released after this recharge was determined for 5 days. The data were analyzed using Student's t- and analysis of variance tests.

resultsIn general, all materials presented higher fluoride release in the first 24 h; G1 and G4 showed a higher fluoride release in this period. On the other hand, G3 and G1 presented the most constant fluoride release until the 8(th) day, wherein all the sealants considerably decreased in the amount of fluoride released.

conclusionG1 and G3 released higher concentrations of fluoride, although no significant differences were found. Giomers recharged in the first 24 h after polymerization presented an improved and sustained fluoride release.

Indexed as

Fluoride releasegiomerrecharge of dental materialssurface prereacted glass ionomertotal ionic strength adjustment buffer

Identifiers

PMID26957792
PMCPMC4760011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.