Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26957662›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Characteristics of Local Health Departments Associated with Implementation of Electronic Health Records and Other Informatics Systems.

Gulzar H Shah, Jonathon P Leider, Brian C Castrucci, Karmen S Williams, Huabin Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Official Websites of Local Health Centers in Taiwan: A Nationwide Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gulzar H ShahGeorgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Statesboro, GA.
Jonathon P Leiderde Beaumont Foundation, Bethesda, MD.
Brian C Castruccide Beaumont Foundation, Bethesda, MD.
Karmen S WilliamsGeorgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Statesboro, GA.
Huabin LuoEast Carolina University, Greenville, NC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssessing local health departments' (LHDs') informatics capacities is important, especially within the context of broader, systems-level health reform. We assessed a nationally representative sample of LHDs' adoption of information systems and the factors associated with adoption and implementation by examining electronic health records, health information exchange, immunization registry, electronic disease reporting system, and electronic laboratory reporting.

methodsWe used data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials' 2013 National Profile of LHDs. We performed descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression for the five implementation-oriented outcome variables of interest, with three levels of implementation (implemented, plan to implement, and no activity). Independent variables included infrastructural and financial capacity and other characteristics associated with informatics capacity.

resultsOf 505 LHDs that responded to the survey, 69 (13.5%) had implemented health information exchanges, 122 (22.2%) had implemented electronic health records, 245 (47.5%) had implemented electronic laboratory reporting, 368 (73.0%) had implemented an electronic disease reporting system, and 416 (83.8%) had implemented an immunization registry. LHD characteristics associated with health informatics adoption included provision of greater number of clinical services, greater per capita public health expenditures, health information systems specialists on staff, larger population size, decentralized governance system, one or more local boards of health, metropolitan jurisdiction, and top executive with more years in the job.

conclusionMany LHDs lack health informatics capacity, particularly in smaller, rural jurisdictions. Cross-jurisdictional sharing, investment in public health informatics infrastructure, and additional training may help address these shortfalls.

Indexed as

American Recovery and Reinvestment ActCommunity Health ServicesElectronic Health RecordsHealth Care ReformHealth Information SystemsHumansLocal GovernmentMultivariate AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26957662
PMCPMC4765976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.