Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26957435›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2016

White-Nose Syndrome Disease Severity and a Comparison of Diagnostic Methods.

Liam P McGuire, James M Turner, Lisa Warnecke, Glenna McGregor, Trent K Bollinger, Vikram Misra, Jeffrey T Foster, Winifred F Frick, A Marm Kilpatrick, Craig K R Willis

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gaussian process forecastsEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ecology and impacts of white-nose syndrome on bats.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Liam P McGuireDepartment of Biology, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R3B 2E9, Canada. liam.mcguire@ttu.edu.
James M TurnerDepartment of Biology, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R3B 2E9, Canada.
Lisa WarneckeDepartment of Biology, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R3B 2E9, Canada.
Glenna McGregorCanadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, Department of Veterinary Pathology, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada.
Trent K BollingerCanadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, Department of Veterinary Pathology, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada.
Vikram MisraDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada.
Jeffrey T FosterDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, & Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.
Winifred F FrickDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
A Marm KilpatrickDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Craig K R WillisDepartment of Biology, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R3B 2E9, Canada.
University of Winnipeg · CACanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health · CAUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of New Hampshire · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White-nose syndrome is caused by the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans and has killed millions of hibernating bats in North America but the pathophysiology of the disease remains poorly understood. Our objectives were to (1) assess non-destructive diagnostic methods for P. destructans infection compared to histopathology, the current gold-standard, and (2) to evaluate potential metrics of disease severity. We used data from three captive inoculation experiments involving 181 little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) to compare histopathology, quantitative PCR (qPCR), and ultraviolet fluorescence as diagnostic methods of P. destructans infection. To assess disease severity, we considered two histology metrics (wing area with fungal hyphae, area of dermal necrosis), P. destructans fungal load (qPCR), ultraviolet fluorescence, and blood chemistry (hematocrit, sodium, glucose, pCO2, and bicarbonate). Quantitative PCR was most effective for early detection of P. destructans, while all three methods were comparable in severe infections. Correlations among hyphae and necrosis scores, qPCR, ultraviolet fluorescence, blood chemistry, and hibernation duration indicate a multi-stage pattern of disease. Disruptions of homeostasis occurred rapidly in late hibernation. Our results provide valuable information about the use of non-destructive techniques for monitoring, and provide novel insight into the pathophysiology of white-nose syndrome, with implications for developing and implementing potential mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAscomycotaBlood Chemical AnalysisCanadaChiropteraDermatomycosesGeographyHibernationPolymerase Chain ReactionSeverity of Illness Indexblood chemistryhistopathologyMyotis lucifugusnon-destructive methodsPCRPseudogymnoascus destructansultraviolet fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID26957435
OpenAlexW2300386459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.