Erratum: RSV-specific airway resident memory CD8+ T cells and differential disease severity after experimental human infection.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Type I IFN ineffectively activates neonatal dendritic cells limiting respiratory antiviral T-cell responses.Mucosal immunology · 2020
   Article
2. Tissue-Resident T Cells and Other Resident Leukocytes.Annual review of immunology · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  RSV-specific airway resident memory CD8+ T cells and differential disease severity after experimental human infection.2015

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.