Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26957309›Full record

ArticleGenome research2016

Comprehensive benchmarking reveals H2BK20 acetylation as a distinctive signature of cell-state-specific enhancers and promoters.

Vibhor Kumar, Nirmala Arul Rayan, Masafumi Muratani, Stefan Lim, Bavani Elanggovan, Lixia Xin, Tess Lu, Harshyaa Makhija, Jeremie Poschmann, Thomas Lufkin and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ePerturbDB: enhancer's experimental perturbation database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Vibhor KumarComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Nirmala Arul RayanComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Masafumi MurataniDepartment of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan; Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Stefan LimComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Bavani ElanggovanComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Lixia XinComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Tess LuComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Harshyaa MakhijaComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Jeremie PoschmannComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Thomas LufkinStem Cell and Developmental Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore; Department of Biology, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699, USA;
Huck Hui NgStem Cell and Developmental Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore; Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Shyam PrabhakarComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore;
Genome Institute of Singapore · SGClarkson University · USNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Epigenetic and Transcriptional Dysregulation in Autism Spectrum DisorderR01MH094714 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GESCHWIND, DANIEL H · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although over 35 different histone acetylation marks have been described, the overwhelming majority of regulatory genomics studies focus exclusively on H3K27ac and H3K9ac. In order to identify novel epigenomic traits of regulatory elements, we constructed a benchmark set of validated enhancers by performing 140 enhancer assays in human T cells. We tested 40 chromatin signatures on this unbiased enhancer set and identified H2BK20ac, a little-studied histone modification, as the most predictive mark of active enhancers. Notably, we detected a novel class of functionally distinct enhancers enriched in H2BK20ac but lacking H3K27ac, which was present in all examined cell lines and also in embryonic forebrain tissue. H2BK20ac was also unique in highlighting cell-type-specific promoters. In contrast, other acetylation marks were present in all active promoters, regardless of cell-type specificity. In stimulated microglial cells, H2BK20ac was more correlated with cell-state-specific expression changes than H3K27ac, with TGF-beta signaling decoupling the two acetylation marks at a subset of regulatory elements. In summary, our study reveals a previously unknown connection between histone acetylation and cell-type-specific gene regulation and indicates that H2BK20ac profiling can be used to uncover new dimensions of gene regulation.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAcetylationCell LineHistonesHumansHistones

Identifiers

PMID26957309
PMCPMC4864461
OpenAlexW2332027634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.