Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26957294›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Distinctive Pattern of Serum Elements During the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease.

Giuseppe Paglia, Oto Miedico, Adriana Cristofano, Michela Vitale, Antonella Angiolillo, Antonio Eugenio Chiaravalle, Gaetano Corso, Alfonso Di Costanzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Metals in Alzheimer's Disease.Biomedicines · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giuseppe PagliaCenter for Biomedicine, European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen, Via Galvani 31, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Oto MiedicoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Puglia e Basilicata, via Manfredonia 20, 71121, Foggia, Italy.
Adriana CristofanoCentre for Research and Training in Medicine for Aging, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V Tiberio", University of Molise, Via De Sanctis 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Michela VitaleCentre for Research and Training in Medicine for Aging, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V Tiberio", University of Molise, Via De Sanctis 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Antonella AngiolilloCentre for Research and Training in Medicine for Aging, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V Tiberio", University of Molise, Via De Sanctis 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Antonio Eugenio ChiaravalleIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Puglia e Basilicata, via Manfredonia 20, 71121, Foggia, Italy.
Gaetano CorsoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Viale L. Pinto 1, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
Alfonso Di CostanzoCentre for Research and Training in Medicine for Aging, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V Tiberio", University of Molise, Via De Sanctis 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Element profiling is an interesting approach for understanding neurodegenerative processes, considering that compelling evidences show that element toxicity might play a crucial role in the onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Aim of this study was to profile 22 serum elements in subjects with or at risk of AD. Thirtyfour patients with probable AD, 20 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 24 with subjective memory complaint (SMC) and 40 healthy subjects (HS) were included in the study. Manganese, iron, copper, zinc, selenium, thallium, antimony, mercury, vanadium and molybdenum changed significantly among the 4 groups. Several essential elements, such as manganese, selenium, zinc and iron tended to increase in SMC and then progressively to decrease in MCI and AD. Toxic elements show a variable behavior, since some elements tended to increase, while others tended to decrease in AD. A multivariate model, built using a panel of six essential elements (manganese, iron, copper, zinc, selenium and calcium) and their ratios, discriminated AD patients from HS with over 90% accuracy. These findings suggest that essential and toxic elements contribute to generate a distinctive signature during the progression of AD, and their monitoring in elderly might help to detect preclinical stages of AD.

Indexed as

ElementsAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSerumElements

Identifiers

PMID26957294
PMCPMC4783774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.