Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26957096›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kiran Kumar Lingutla, Raymond Pollock, Sashin Ahuja

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05052762 (Comparison of the Effect of Weighted and Elastic Resistance Training of Gluteus Maximus in Subjects With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05052762 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effect of Weighted and Elastic Resistance Training of Gluteus Maximus in Subjects With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled54ConditionsSacroiliac DisorderArmsGroup A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength, Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utility of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review of the literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Trial
  5. Cryoneurolysis of Sacral Lateral Branches for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ)].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2022
    Review
  13. Impact of diagnosis and type of sacroiliac joint fusion on postoperative complications.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint: Surgical Treatments.International journal of spine surgery · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiran Kumar LingutlaWelsh Centre for Spinal Trauma and Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, Wales, UK.
Raymond PollockWelsh Centre for Spinal Trauma and Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, Wales, UK. ray@pollock.org.uk.
Sashin AhujaWelsh Centre for Spinal Trauma and Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, Wales, UK.
University Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background contextAlthough pain is generally regarded as originating in the lumbar spine, it has been estimated that in 15-30 % of patients, LBP originates from the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). PURPOSE: To determine whether sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) for LBP is effective in reducing pain when the SIJ is known to be the pain generator. STUDY DESIGN/

settingSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsA systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed of observational studies describing outcome of SIJF in patients with LBP. Outcome measures were VAS pain, ODI, SF-36 PCS/MCS and Majeed score. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline and Google scholar. The methodological quality of selected studies was assessed using the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute case series quality assessment tool. Meta-analysis was used to combine the studies for each outcome and forest plots were prepared. Outcomes were expressed as mean difference (MD).

resultsSix studies were included in the meta-analysis with a mean follow-up of 17.6 months. All outcomes showed statistical and clinical improvement (VAS pain MD: 54.8; 95 % CI 48.6, 61.0; n = 380; p < 0.001, ODI MD: 14.5; 95 % CI 8.4, 20.6; n = 102; p < 0.001, SF-36 PCS MD: -19.5; 95 % CI -24.7, -14.2; n = 140; p < 0.001, SF-36 MCS MD: -8.5; 95 % CI -12.9, -4.1; n = 198; p < 0.001 and Majeed score MD: -35.4; 95 % CI -48.5, -22.2; n = 140; p < 0.001).

conclusionsSIJF appears to be a satisfactory procedure for alleviating pelvic girdle pain.

Indexed as

ArthrodesisHumansLow Back PainPelvic Girdle PainSacroiliac JointVisual Analog ScaleFusionLow back painMeta-analysisOutcomePelvic girdle painSacroiliac joint

Identifiers

PMID26957096
OpenAlexW2318676732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.