Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26957031›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Three Dimensional Organization of Genome Might Have Guided the Dynamics of Gene Order Evolution in Eukaryotes.

Meenakshi Bagadia, Arashdeep Singh, Kuljeet Singh Sandhu

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meenakshi BagadiaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER)-Mohali, SAS Nagar 140306, India.
Arashdeep SinghDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER)-Mohali, SAS Nagar 140306, India.
Kuljeet Singh SandhuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER)-Mohali, SAS Nagar 140306, India sandhuks@iisermohali.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In eukaryotes, genes are nonrandomly organized into short gene-dense regions or "gene-clusters" interspersed by long gene-poor regions. How these gene-clusters have evolved is not entirely clear. Gene duplication may not account for all the gene-clusters since the genes in most of the clusters do not exhibit significant sequence similarity. In this study, using genome-wide data sets from budding yeast, fruit-fly, and human, we show that: 1) long-range evolutionary repositioning of genes strongly associate with their spatial proximity in the nucleus; 2) presence of evolutionary DNA break-points at involved loci hints at their susceptibility to undergo long-range genomic rearrangements; and 3) correlated epigenetic and transcriptional states of engaged genes highlight the underlying evolutionary constraints. The significance of observation 1, 2, and 3 are particularly stronger for the instances of inferred evolutionary gain, as compared with loss, of linear gene-clustering. These observations suggest that the long-range genomic rearrangements guided through 3D genome organization might have contributed to the evolution of gene order. We further hypothesize that the evolution of linear gene-clusters in eukaryotic genomes might have been mediated through spatial interactions among distant loci in order to optimize co-ordinated regulation of genes. We model this hypothesis through a heuristic model of gene-order evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeEukaryotaGene OrderGenomicsHumansMultigene Familychromatin interactionsgene-clustersgenome organizationgenomic rearrangements

Identifiers

PMID26957031
PMCPMC4824123
OpenAlexW2324994116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.