ReviewDer Orthopade2016
[Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures in Pediatric and Adult Populations: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative finite element analysis of fixation strategies for sports-related tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in adolescents: biomechanical evidence for optimized clinical decision-making.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- An unusual Ogden type V tibial tubercle avulsion fracture: a case report and literature review.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Review
- [Injuries of the knee extensor complex in children].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Risk factor analysis for tibial tubercle avulsion fractures in children.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Clinical and epidemiological features of tibial tubercle avulsion fracture in Chinese adolescents.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe tear-off of the apophysis of the proximal tibia is a rare injury (< 1 % of all apophysal lesions). It mainly affects male adolescents (14,6 years). Main causes are concentric and eccentric stress during sport activity. Morbus Osgood-Schlater seems to be a predisposing factor.
aimUp-to-date survey of pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment strategies. MATERIAL AND
methodsLiterature research (level III and IV studies) as well as own results.
resultsThe affected patients are mostly male (97 %), type III fractures are most frequently seen (48 %). Accompanying injuries are not to be missed (10 %). The treatment usually consists of surgery by means of an open reposition and internal refixation, recently also minimal invasi. The results are mainly very good to good, approximately 95 % reach their old level of activity again. Almost one third of the patients develop a mostly slight complication.
conclusionThe acute tear-off of the apophysis of the proximal tibia is an infrequent disease. In dislocated injuries the standard procedure is the open reposition and the internal fixation. Lesions within the knee are particularly to be expected in intraarticular fractures und must not be missed. A very good to good result is to be expected with correct treatment, momentous complications are all together rare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.