Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26956937›Full record

SynthesisJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2016

Cadmium exposure and risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies among general and occupational populations.

Cheng Chen, Pengcheng Xun, Muneko Nishijo, Ka He

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Toxicity Tolerance in the Carcinogenesis of Environmental Cadmium.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheng ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health - Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Pengcheng XunDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health - Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Muneko NishijoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan.
Ka HeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health - Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USKanazawa Medical University · JP

Funding

Trace element levels and risk of strokeR01ES021735 · NIEHS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KAHE, KA, MCCLURE, LESLIE AIN · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
Trace Elements and CVD Risks Factors Among Young AdultsR01HL081572 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAHE, KA · 2006 to 2008
$1.2M
Dietary supplement use, physical activity, body mass index, and pancreatic cancerR03CA139261 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAHE, KA · 2009 to 2011
$146k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA139261NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081572NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between cadmium exposure and risk of lung cancer is still unclear. We quantitatively reviewed the observational studies that investigated the association between cadmium exposure and lung cancer risk in both general and occupational populations published through April 2015. The final data set is comprised of three cohort studies in the general population totaling 22,551 participants (354 events) with a mean follow-up of 15 years, five occupational cohort studies including 4205 individuals (180 events) with an average follow-up of 31 years, and three occupational case-control studies including 4740 cases and 6268 controls. Comparing the highest to the lowest category of cadmium exposure, the weighted relative risk and 95% confidence interval of lung cancer in the general population was 1.42 (95% CI (0.91, 2.23)); the weighted risk estimates (95% CIs) of lung cancer in three occupational cohort studies and three case-control studies were 0.68 (95% CI (0.33, 1.41)) and 1.61 (95% CI (0.94, 2.75)), respectively. No linear association was found. When comparing participants exposed to cadmium with non-exposed based on available data, the association became statistically significant. According to findings from this meta-analysis, the possibility that cadmium exposure may increase risk of lung cancer cannot be completely ruled out in either general or occupational population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCadmiumCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureRisk FactorsYoung AdultCadmium

Identifiers

PMID26956937
OpenAlexW2294288683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.