Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26956900›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2016

Evolving Management of Zenker's Diverticulum in the Endoscopic Era: A North American Experience.

Daniel Jones, Abdullah Aloraini, Stephen Gowing, Jonathan Cools-Lartigue, Mara Leimanis, Roger Tabah, Lorenzo Ferri

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of Zenker's diverticulum using flexible endoscopy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel JonesDivision of Thoracic, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Room L9-112, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G4, Canada. daniel.jones2@mail.mcgill.ca.
Abdullah AlorainiDivision of Thoracic, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Room L9-112, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G4, Canada.
Stephen GowingDivision of Thoracic, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Room L9-112, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G4, Canada.
Jonathan Cools-LartigueDivision of Thoracic, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Room L9-112, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G4, Canada.
Mara LeimanisDivision of Thoracic, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Room L9-112, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G4, Canada.
Roger TabahDivision of General Surgery, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lorenzo FerriDivision of Thoracic, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Room L9-112, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G4, Canada.
McGill University · CAMontreal General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen surgical cricopharyngeal myotomy(CM) is considered standard of care for Zenker's diverticulum(ZD). Trans-oral CM has been described using a rigid stapling device for two decades; however, this remains problematic for severely kyphotic patients. This problem can be overcome with flexible endoscopy utilizing an electrosurgical needle knife. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between these techniques to stratify patient selection.

methodsPatients undergoing ZD treatment from 1992 to 2015 were reviewed. Demographics, diverticulum size, post-operative complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between open cricopharyngeal myotomy (OpenCM), rigid trans-oral stapling myotomy (RigidCM), and flexible endoscopic myotomy (FlexCM). Dysphagia scores (DS, 0:best-4:worst) and pneumonia incidence were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively.

results62 patients underwent OpenCM (39/62(63 %)) or endoscopic CM (23/62(37 %) (8 RigidCM/15 FlexCM)). CM significantly reduced dysphagia for all approaches [OpenCM:2(2-3)-0(0-0); RigidCM:2(2-2)-0(0-0); FlexCM:3(3-3)-0(0-0)]. FlexCM patients had significantly worse pre-operative DS. Endoscopic CM was attempted and completed in 23/35(66 %) patients. Reasons for OpenCM conversion included inability to position the diverticular retractor due to patient body habitus (RigidCM), and the inability to position the overtube due to small ZD (FlexCM). Major post-operative complications were rare and similar in all groups. Medium-to-long-term post-myotomy pneumonia was comparable between groups. LOS (days) was reduced for FlexCM (1(1-2)) versus RigidCM (3(2-6)) and OpenCM (4(3-7)).

conclusionsCM is highly effective for treating ZD. Open and endoscopic approaches offer comparable outcomes and dysphagia resolution. FlexCM is efficacious for large ZD and can be performed in most patients irrespective of body habitus. FlexCM represents an excellent approach for large ZD, while OpenCM should be reserved for small ZD for which an overtube cannot be positioned.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDeglutition DisordersDisease ManagementEndoscopes, GastrointestinalEsophagoscopyFemaleGastroscopyHumansLength of StayMalePharyngeal MusclesPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurgical Stapling

Identifiers

PMID26956900
OpenAlexW2296905470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.