Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26956579›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016

Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robert J Boyle, Despo Ierodiakonou, Tasnia Khan, Jennifer Chivinge, Zoe Robinson, Natalie Geoghegan, Katharine Jarrold, Thalia Afxentiou, Tim Reeves, Sergio Cunha and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ASCIA Guideline: Infant Feeding for Food Allergy Prevention.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Protein hydrolysate versus standard formula for preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Protein hydrolysate versus standard formula for preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Early additional food and fluids for healthy breastfed full-term infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Primary Prevention of Allergy - Is It Feasible?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J BoyleSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK r.boyle@nhs.net.
Despo IerodiakonouSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK Respiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW3 6LR, UK.
Tasnia KhanSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.
Jennifer ChivingeSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.
Zoe RobinsonSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.
Natalie GeogheganSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.
Katharine JarroldSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.
Thalia AfxentiouSection of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.
Tim ReevesRespiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW3 6LR, UK.
Sergio CunhaImperial Consultants, London SW7 2PG, UK.
Marialena TrivellaCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
Vanessa Garcia-LarsenRespiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW3 6LR, UK.
Jo Leonardi-BeeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Imperial College London · GBImperial Consultants · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether feeding infants with hydrolysed formula reduces their risk of allergic or autoimmune disease.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis, as part of a series of systematic reviews commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency to inform guidelines on infant feeding. Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and LILACS searched between January 1946 and April 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Prospective intervention trials of hydrolysed cows' milk formula compared with another hydrolysed formula, human breast milk, or a standard cows' milk formula, which reported on allergic or autoimmune disease or allergic sensitisation.

results37 eligible intervention trials of hydrolysed formula were identified, including over 19,000 participants. There was evidence of conflict of interest and high or unclear risk of bias in most studies of allergic outcomes and evidence of publication bias for studies of eczema and wheeze. Overall there was no consistent evidence that partially or extensively hydrolysed formulas reduce risk of allergic or autoimmune outcomes in infants at high pre-existing risk of these outcomes. Odds ratios for eczema at age 0-4, compared with standard cows' milk formula, were 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.07; I(2)=30%) for partially hydrolysed formula; 0.55 (0.28 to 1.09; I(2)=74%) for extensively hydrolysed casein based formula; and 1.12 (0.88 to 1.42; I(2)=0%) for extensively hydrolysed whey based formula. There was no evidence to support the health claim approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that a partially hydrolysed formula could reduce the risk of eczema nor the conclusion of the Cochrane review that hydrolysed formula could allergy to cows' milk.

conclusionThese findings do not support current guidelines that recommend the use of hydrolysed formula to prevent allergic disease in high risk infants. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013004252.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesCaseinsDietary ProteinsFood HypersensitivityHumansImmune ToleranceInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaProspective StudiesRiskcasein hydrolysateCaseinsDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26956579
PMCPMC4783517
OpenAlexW2294782569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.