Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26956490›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Predicting chemical bioavailability using microarray gene expression data and regression modeling: A tale of three explosive compounds.

Ping Gong, Xiaofei Nan, Natalie D Barker, Robert E Boyd, Yixin Chen, Dawn E Wilkins, David R Johnson, Burton C Suedel, Edward J Perkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ping GongEnvironmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, 39180, USA. ping.gong@usace.army.mil.
Xiaofei NanDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, 38677, USA. iexfnan@zzu.edu.cn.
Natalie D BarkerBennett Aerospace Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 27518, USA. Natalie.D.Barker@usace.army.mil.
Robert E BoydEnvironmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, 39180, USA. Robert.E.Boyd@usace.army.mil.
Yixin ChenDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, 38677, USA. ychen@cs.olemiss.edu.
Dawn E WilkinsDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, 38677, USA. dwilkins@cs.olemiss.edu.
David R JohnsonGHD, Dallas, Texas, 75234, USA. david.r.johnson@ghd.com.
Burton C SuedelEnvironmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, 39180, USA. Burton.Suedel@usace.army.mil.
Edward J PerkinsEnvironmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, 39180, USA. Edward.J.Perkins@usace.army.mil.
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center · USUniversity of Mississippi · USBennett Aerospace (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemical bioavailability is an important dose metric in environmental risk assessment. Although many approaches have been used to evaluate bioavailability, not a single approach is free from limitations. Previously, we developed a new genomics-based approach that integrated microarray technology and regression modeling for predicting bioavailability (tissue residue) of explosives compounds in exposed earthworms. In the present study, we further compared 18 different regression models and performed variable selection simultaneously with parameter estimation.

resultsThis refined approach was applied to both previously collected and newly acquired earthworm microarray gene expression datasets for three explosive compounds. Our results demonstrate that a prediction accuracy of R(2) = 0.71-0.82 was achievable at a relatively low model complexity with as few as 3-10 predictor genes per model. These results are much more encouraging than our previous ones.

conclusionThis study has demonstrated that our approach is promising for bioavailability measurement, which warrants further studies of mixed contamination scenarios in field settings.

Indexed as

AnimalsAzocinesBiological AvailabilityExplosive AgentsGene Expression ProfilingOligochaetaOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRegression AnalysisSoil PollutantsTriazinesTrinitrotolueneAzocinescycloniteExplosive AgentsoctogenSoil PollutantsTriazinesTrinitrotoluene

Identifiers

PMID26956490
PMCPMC4784335
OpenAlexW2293592273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.