Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26956446›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2016

Profiling of Leptospira interrogans, L. santarosai, L. meyeri and L. borgpetersenii by SE-AFLP, PFGE and susceptibility testing--a continuous attempt at species and serovar differentiation.

Luisa Z Moreno, Fabiana Miraglia, Walter Lilenbaum, José S F Neto, Julio C Freitas, Zenaide M Morais, Rudy A Hartskeerl, Barbara L P da Costa, Silvio A Vasconcellos, Andrea M Moreno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Leptospiral Culture without 5'-Fluorouracil Revealed ImprovedInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  9. Antimicrobial Resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2018
    Review
  10. Genomic Comparison Among Global Isolates ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Luisa Z MorenoLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance/Laboratory of Bacterial Zoonosis, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo/SP 05508 270, Brazil.
Fabiana MiragliaLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance/Laboratory of Bacterial Zoonosis, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo/SP 05508 270, Brazil.
Walter LilenbaumVeterinary Bacteriology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Fluminense Federal University, Hernani Mello, 101 Niterói/RJ 24210 130, Brazil.
José S F NetoLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance/Laboratory of Bacterial Zoonosis, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo/SP 05508 270, Brazil.
Julio C FreitasLaboratory of Animal Leptospirosis, Londrina State University, Rod Celso Garcia Cid, Londrina/PR 86057 970, Brazil.
Zenaide M MoraisLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance/Laboratory of Bacterial Zoonosis, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo/SP 05508 270, Brazil.
Rudy A HartskeerlWHO/FAO/OIE and National Leptospirosis Reference Centre, KIT Biomedical Research, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam 391105, Netherlands.
Barbara L P da CostaLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance/Laboratory of Bacterial Zoonosis, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo/SP 05508 270, Brazil.
Silvio A VasconcellosLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance/Laboratory of Bacterial Zoonosis, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo/SP 05508 270, Brazil.
Andrea M MorenoLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance/Laboratory of Bacterial Zoonosis, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo/SP 05508 270, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-566X
Universidade de São Paulo · BRRoyal Tropical Institute · NLUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a widespread systemic zoonosis, considered as reemerging in certain developing countries. Although the cross agglutinin absorption test is still considered the standard method for Leptospira identification, it presents several disadvantages. The aim of this study was to characterize Leptospira spp. isolated from various hosts by genotyping and broth microdilution susceptibility testing in an attempt to differentiate Leptospira species, serogroups and serovars. Forty-seven isolates were studied. They were previously serotyped, and species confirmation was performed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Single-enzyme amplified fragment length polymorphism (SE-AFLP) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis enabled the distinction of L. interrogans from L. santarosai, L. meyeri and L. borgpetersenii in two main clusters. Among L. interrogans, it was possible to differentiate into two new clusters the serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae from the serogroups Canicola and Pomona. L. santarosai isolates presented higher genetic variation than the other species in both techniques. Interestingly, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) cluster analysis also provided Leptospira serogroup differentiation. Further studies are necessary regarding serovar Bananal isolates, as they presented the highest MIC values for most of the antimicrobials tested. All studied techniques successfully distinguished Leptospira species and serogroups. Despite being library-dependent methods, these approaches are less labor intensive and more economically viable, particularly SE-AFLP, and can be implemented in most reference laboratories worldwide to enable faster Leptospira typing.

Indexed as

Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenetic VariationGenotypeLeptospiraLeptospira interrogansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymorphism, GeneticRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, RNASerogroupSerotypingAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26956446
PMCPMC4820670
OpenAlexW2295800701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.