Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26956154›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2016

Who benefits most from influenza vaccination policy: a study among the elderly in Beijing, China.

Tongtong Li, Min Lv, Trudy Lei, Jiang Wu, Xinghuo Pang, Ying Deng, Zheng Xie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tongtong LiSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China.
Min LvBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, 100013, P.R. China.
Trudy LeiColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, 10032, USA.
Jiang WuBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, 100013, P.R. China.
Xinghuo PangBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, 100013, P.R. China.
Ying DengBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, 100013, P.R. China.
Zheng XieSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China. xiezheng@bjmu.edu.cn.
Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNPeking University · CNColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza continues to have a major impact on vulnerable populations worldwide, particularly among the elderly (≥ 60 years of age). Vaccination for targeted groups is recommended by the WHO as the most effective way to control influenza infections. Since 2009, the Beijing municipal government has provided influenza vaccination to the elderly at no out-of-pocket cost to reduce influenza threats and improve related health equality. The study aims to evaluate the equality of the policy, and to analyze factors that bring influences to equality.

methodsBased on data from a household survey, concentration index (CI) was calculated to measure the socioeconomic inequality in influenza vaccination. A Logit regression model was used to decompose CI, in which the contribution of each determinant was calculated and the percentages of these contribution were obtained.

resultsFree influenza vaccination at point of use shows significant pro-poor distribution among the elderly in Beijing (CI = -0.115). After the decomposition of CI, the elderly with lower income, higher education, and living in rural areas were more likely to get the influenza vaccination, in which place of residence (contribution percentage = 57 %) held the most contribution of variance.

conclusionsBeijing's free influenza vaccination strategy at point of use could provide the poor elderly with equal opportunities to receive preventive health service, showing a significant pro-poor distribution. The poor elderly, who live in rural areas with high education, benefit most from the policy. Further policy interventions should target the population living in urban areas in order to improve the utilization of public health services and health equality.

Indexed as

Immunity, HerdAgedAged, 80 and overBeijingHealthcare DisparitiesHealth ExpendituresHumansInfluenza VaccinesMass VaccinationPreventive Health ServicesRural PopulationUrban PopulationInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26956154
PMCPMC4784370
OpenAlexW2294842146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.