Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26955969›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Health care contact following a new incident neck or low back pain episode in the general population; the HUNT study.

Astrid Woodhouse, Kristine Pape, Pål R Romundstad, Ottar Vasseljen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adverse events following cervical spine self-manipulation: A systematic review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Back pain occurrence and treatment-seeking behavior among nurses: the role of work-related emotional burden.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Astrid WoodhouseDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter, P.O. Box 8905, Trondheim, 7491, Norway. astrid.woodhouse@ntnu.no.
Kristine PapeDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter, P.O. Box 8905, Trondheim, 7491, Norway.
Pål R RomundstadDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter, P.O. Box 8905, Trondheim, 7491, Norway.
Ottar VasseljenDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter, P.O. Box 8905, Trondheim, 7491, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back and neck pain are commonly reported in the general population and represent frequent causes for health care consultations. The main aim of this study was to describe the determinants of health care contact during a 1-year period in a general population with recent onset spinal pain.

methodsFrom 9056 participants in a general health survey in Norway we identified 219 persons reporting a recent onset (<1 month) of low back or neck pain. Questionnaires were given at 1 (baseline), 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after pain debut. The main outcome was self-reported health care contact due to spinal pain. Associations between health care contact and pain-related factors, other somatic and mental health factors, pain-related work limitations, physical activity and sociodemographic factors were explored.

resultsConventional health care was sought by 93 persons (43 %) at least once throughout the year following the onset of pain. 18 persons (8 %) sought alternative health care only and 108 persons (49 %) sought no kind of health care. Baseline reports of coexisting low back and neck pain of equal intensity, poor self-reported health, symptoms of anxiety or depression, obesity and smoking were all associated with an increased tendency to seek conventional health care. Pain intensity and pain-related work limitations at each occasion were strongly associated with concurrent health care contact throughout the year. Higher education was associated with a reduced tendency to contact health care and no association was found for physical activity.

conclusionThe main finding in this study was that people from the general population who seek health-care for a new incident of neck or low back pain report more symptoms of mental distress, poorer self-reported health and more intense pain with stronger work limitations compared to those who do not. The findings suggest that identification of complementary symptoms is highly relevant in the examination of spinal pain patients, even for those with recent onset of symptoms.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCommunity Health PlanningData CollectionDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth SurveysHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainNorwayPain MeasurementProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26955969
PMCPMC4782331
OpenAlexW2294058228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.