Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26955891›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2016

Lung ventilation strategies for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Changsong Wang, Xiaoyang Wang, Chunjie Chi, Libo Guo, Lei Guo, Nana Zhao, Weiwei Wang, Xin Pi, Bo Sun, Ailing Lian and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03698799 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Adherence Rate to Lung Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Admitted to Surgical Intensive Care Units and Associated Clinical Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled306ConditionsAdult, Guideline Adherence, Humans, Intensive Care Units
NCT07148674 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Positive Expiratory Pressure on Acute Mountain Sickness, a Pilot Crossover Trial at 6000 Meters

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiALP - Alpine, Disaster and Wilderness MedicineRan2025 to 2025Enrolled3ConditionsAcute Mountain Sickness (AMS)ArmsPositive Expiratory Pressure (10cmH2O) in hypobaric hypoxia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Changsong WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xiaoyang WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Chunjie ChiDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Libo GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Lei GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Nana ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Weiwei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xin PiDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Bo SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Ailing LianDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jinghui ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Enyou LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify the best lung ventilation strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), we performed a network meta-analysis. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Web of Science were searched, and 36 eligible articles were included. Compared with higher tidal volumes with FiO2-guided lower positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], the hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality were 0.624 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.419-0.98) for lower tidal volumes with FiO2-guided lower PEEP and prone positioning and 0.572 (0.34-0.968) for pressure-controlled ventilation with FiO2-guided lower PEEP. Lower tidal volumes with FiO2-guided higher PEEP and prone positioning had the greatest potential to reduce mortality, and the possibility of receiving the first ranking was 61.6%. Permissive hypercapnia, recruitment maneuver, and low airway pressures were most likely to be the worst in terms of all-cause mortality. Compared with higher tidal volumes with FiO2-guided lower PEEP, pressure-controlled ventilation with FiO2-guided lower PEEP and lower tidal volumes with FiO2-guided lower PEEP and prone positioning ventilation are associated with lower mortality in ARDS patients. Lower tidal volumes with FiO2-guided higher PEEP and prone positioning ventilation and lower tidal volumes with pressure-volume (P-V) static curve-guided individual PEEP are potential optimal strategies for ARDS patients.

Indexed as

VentilationHumansLungRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory Function Tests

Identifiers

PMID26955891
PMCPMC4783789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.