Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26955876›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2016

Conversion of nanoscale topographical information of cluster-assembled zirconia surfaces into mechanotransductive events promotes neuronal differentiation.

Carsten Schulte, Simona Rodighiero, Martino Alfredo Cappelluti, Luca Puricelli, Elisa Maffioli, Francesca Borghi, Armando Negri, Elisa Sogne, Massimiliano Galluzzi, Claudio Piazzoni and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microfluidic Systems for Neural Cell Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carsten SchulteCIMAINA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, Milan, 20133, Italy. carsten.schulte@unimi.it.
Simona RodighieroFondazione Filarete, via le Ortles 22/4, Milan, 20139, Italy. simona.rodighiero@scopem.ethz.ch.
Martino Alfredo CappellutiSEMM European School of Molecular Medicine, Via Adamello 16, Milan, 20139, Italy. martinoalfredo.cappelluti@fondazionefilarete.com.
Luca PuricelliCIMAINA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, Milan, 20133, Italy. luca.puricelli@unimi.it.
Elisa MaffioliDIVET, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, Milan, 20133, Italy. elisa.maffioli@guest.unimi.it.
Francesca BorghiCIMAINA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, Milan, 20133, Italy. francesca.borghi@unimi.it.
Armando NegriDIVET, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, Milan, 20133, Italy. armando.negri@unimi.it.
Elisa SogneSEMM European School of Molecular Medicine, Via Adamello 16, Milan, 20139, Italy. eli.sogne@gmail.com.
Massimiliano GalluzziCIMAINA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, Milan, 20133, Italy. massimiliano.galluzzi@szu.edu.cn.
Claudio PiazzoniCIMAINA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, Milan, 20133, Italy. claudio.piazzoni@unimi.it.
Margherita TamplenizzaFondazione Filarete, via le Ortles 22/4, Milan, 20139, Italy. margherita.tamplenizza@tensivemed.com.
Alessandro PodestàCIMAINA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, Milan, 20133, Italy. alessandro.podesta@mi.infn.it.
Gabriella TedeschiDIVET, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, Milan, 20133, Italy. gabriella.tedeschi@unimi.it.
Cristina LenardiCIMAINA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, Milan, 20133, Italy. cristina.lenardi@mi.infn.it.
Paolo MilaniCIMAINA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 16, Milan, 20133, Italy. paolo.milani@mi.infn.it.
University of Milan · ITEuropean School of Molecular Medicine · ITFondazione Filarete · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThanks to mechanotransductive components cells are competent to perceive nanoscale topographical features of their environment and to convert the immanent information into corresponding physiological responses. Due to its complex configuration, unraveling the role of the extracellular matrix is particularly challenging. Cell substrates with simplified topographical cues, fabricated by top-down micro- and nanofabrication approaches, have been useful in order to identify basic principles. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of this conversion remain only partially understood.

resultsHere we present the results of a broad, systematic and quantitative approach aimed at understanding how the surface nanoscale information is converted into cell response providing a profound causal link between mechanotransductive events, proceeding from the cell/nanostructure interface to the nucleus. We produced nanostructured ZrO2 substrates with disordered yet controlled topographic features by the bottom-up technique supersonic cluster beam deposition, i.e. the assembling of zirconia nanoparticles from the gas phase on a flat substrate through a supersonic expansion. We used PC12 cells, a well-established model in the context of neuronal differentiation. We found that the cell/nanotopography interaction enforces a nanoscopic architecture of the adhesion regions that affects the focal adhesion dynamics and the cytoskeletal organization, which thereby modulates the general biomechanical properties by decreasing the rigidity of the cell. The mechanotransduction impacts furthermore on transcription factors relevant for neuronal differentiation (e.g. CREB), and eventually the protein expression profile. Detailed proteomic data validated the observed differentiation. In particular, the abundance of proteins that are involved in adhesome and/or cytoskeletal organization is striking, and their up- or downregulation is in line with their demonstrated functions in neuronal differentiation processes.

conclusionOur work provides a deep insight into the molecular mechanotransductive mechanisms that realize the conversion of the nanoscale topographical information of SCBD-fabricated surfaces into cellular responses, in this case neuronal differentiation. The results lay a profound cell biological foundation indicating the strong potential of these surfaces in promoting neuronal differentiation events which could be exploited for the development of prospective research and/or biomedical applications. These applications could be e.g. tools to study mechanotransductive processes, improved neural interfaces and circuits, or cell culture devices supporting neurogenic processes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCytoskeletonDown-RegulationExtracellular MatrixMechanotransduction, CellularNanoparticlesNanostructuresPC12 CellsRatsSurface PropertiesUp-RegulationZirconiumZirconiumzirconium oxide

Identifiers

PMID26955876
PMCPMC4784317
OpenAlexW2293985034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.