Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26955508›Full record

ArticleGMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW2016

A new in vivo model using a dorsal skinfold chamber to investigate microcirculation and angiogenesis in diabetic wounds.

Stefan Langer, Christian Beescho, Andrej Ring, Olivia Dorfmann, Hans Ulrich Steinau, Nick Spindler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Driving adult tissue repair via re-engagement of a pathway required for fetal healing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  5. Bioengineered · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. MethodsX · 2021
    Article
  8. Understanding angiogenesis during aging: opportunities for discoveries and new models.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan LangerDepartment of Plastic, Esthetic and Special Hand Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
Christian BeeschoDepartment of Plastic, Esthetic and Special Hand Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
Andrej RingDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Severe Burns, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
Olivia DorfmannDepartment of Plastic, Esthetic and Special Hand Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
Hans Ulrich SteinauDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Nick SpindlerDepartment of Plastic, Esthetic and Special Hand Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
University Hospital Leipzig · DEBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DEEssen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetes mellitus describes a dysregulation of glucose metabolism due to improper insulin secretion, reduced insulin efficacy or both. It is a well-known fact that diabetic patients are likely to suffer from impaired wound healing, as diabetes strongly affects tissue angiogenesis. Until now, no satisfying in vivo murine model has been established to analyze the dynamics of angiogenesis during diabetic wound healing. To help understand the pathophysiology of diabetes and its effect on angiogenesis, a novel in vivo murine model was established using the skinfold chamber in mice. MATERIALS AND

methodsMutant diabetic mice (db; BKS.Cg-m+/+Lepr (db) /J), wildtype mice (dock7Lepr (db) +/+m) and laboratory BALB/c mice were examined. They were kept in single cages with access to laboratory chow with an 12/12 hour day/night circle. Lesions of the panniculus muscle (Ø 2 mm) were created in the center of the transparent window chamber and the subsequent muscular wound healing was then observed for a period of 22 days. Important analytic parameters included vessel diameter, red blood cell velocity, vascular permeability, and leakage of muscle capillaries and post capillary venules. The key parameters were functional capillary density (FCD) and angiogenesis positive area (APA).

resultsWe established a model which allows high resolution in vivo imaging of functional angiogenesis in diabetic wounds. As expected, db mice showed impaired wound closure (day 22) compared to wounds of BALB/c or WT mice (day 15). FCD was lower in diabetic mice compared to WT and BALB/c during the entire observation period. The dynamics of angiogenesis also decreased in db mice, as reflected by the lowest APA levels. Significant variations in the skin buildup were observed, with the greatest skin depth in db mice. Furthermore, in db mice, the dermis:subcutaneous ratio was highly shifted towards the subcutaneous layers as opposed to WT or BALB/c mice.

conclusionUsing this new in vivo model of the skinfold chamber, it was possible to analyze and quantify microangiopathical changes which are essential for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of disturbed wound healing. Research in microcirculation is important to display perfusion in wounds versus healthy tissue. Using our model, we were able to compare wound healing in diabetic and healthy mice. We were also able to objectively analyze perfusion in wound edges and compare microcirculatory parameters. This model may be well suited to augment different therapeutic options.

Indexed as

angiogenesisdiabetic woundsmicrocirculationskinfold chamber

Identifiers

PMID26955508
PMCPMC4764794
OpenAlexW2295501718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.