Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26955229›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2016

The management of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: A systematic literature review.

Diane Reid

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05662579 (Effect of a Core Muscle Resistance Program on Great Trochanteric Pain Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05662579 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of a Core Muscle Resistance Program on Great Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS): Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled26ConditionsTrochanteric BursitisArmsExercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Endoscopic management of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS): a comprehensive systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Low-dose radiotherapy for greater trochanteric pain syndrome-a single-centre analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diane ReidThe University of Salford, The Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, United Kingdom.
University of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a common cause of lateral hip pain. Most cases respond to conservative treatments with a few refractory cases requiring surgical intervention. For many years, this condition was believed to be caused by trochanteric bursitis, with treatments targeting the bursitis. More recently gluteal tendinopathy/tears have been proposed as potential causes. Treatments are consequently developing to target these proposed pathologies. At present there is no defined treatment protocol for GTPS. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to evaluate the current evidence for the effectiveness of GTPS interventions, both conservative and surgical.

Indexed as

Greater trochanteric pain syndromeSurgeryTendinopathyTreatmentTrochanteric bursitis

Identifiers

PMID26955229
PMCPMC4761624
OpenAlexW2284851945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.