Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26954694›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting.

Anneke van der Zee, Lieuwe Roorda, Gerda Bosman, Jacobus M Ossewaarde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Descriptive Epidemiology ofBioMed research international · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Mobile Colistin-Resistant GenesAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Urine polymerase chain reaction tests: stewardship helper or hinderance?Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Direct molecular detection of amoxicillin-susceptibleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anneke van der ZeeMedical Microbiology, and Molecular Diagnostics Unit, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieuwe RoordaMedical Microbiology, and Molecular Diagnostics Unit, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerda BosmanMedical Microbiology, and Molecular Diagnostics Unit, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacobus M OssewaardeMedical Microbiology, and Molecular Diagnostics Unit, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maasstad Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of our study was the development of a semi-quantitative real-time PCR to detect uropathogens. Two multiplex PCR reactions were designed to detect Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 16S based PCR was performed in parallel to detect Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Firstly to identify non-targeted agents of infection in the same urine specimen, and secondly to quantify background flora. The method was evaluated in comparison with standard bacterial culture, and a commercial PCR kit for detection of uropathogens.

findingsAnalysis with a known panel of 116 clinical isolates yielded a PCR specificity of 100%. Analysis of urine specimens from 211 patients revealed a high correlation of PCR Cq values with both culture positivity and quantity. Concordance between PCR and culture was 98% when both methods yielded results. PCR was found to be more sensitive than culture. With a cut-off Cq value of 33, the negative predictive value of PCR was 94%. The 16S PCR confirmed most results. One specimen was positive by 16S PCR suggesting another cause of infection not detected by the specific PCR assays.

conclusionWe conclude that it is feasible to detect and identify uropathogens by multiplex real-time PCR assay.

Indexed as

Multiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial InfectionsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedReagent Kits, DiagnosticReproducibility of ResultsReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26954694
PMCPMC4783162
OpenAlexW2294614149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.