ReviewJAMA2016
Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient: A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.
Review in JAMA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01954771 (A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study on Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose), which is not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study on Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Protocols in Predicting Glucose Levels in Senior Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 299 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in the Hospital: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines.Diabetes care · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence gap on antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy in frail older adults : A systematic review.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2020Guideline
- Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Guideline
- 2016 Update on Medical Overuse: A Systematic Review.JAMA internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- The Burden of Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose on Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life and Locus of Control in Patients with Noninsulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: The PRISMA Study.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2016Trial
- Bridging the gap in early cardio-renal risk prevention in type 2 diabetes: evidence, guidelines, and real-world insights from the PRECARE NO LiMITS initiative.Acta diabetologica · 2026Review
- Polypharmacy Reflects Metabolic Burden Rather than Frailty in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing type 2 diabetes management in older adults with cancer through comprehensive geriatric assessment-guided medication reviews: a monocentric retrospective study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Article
- A Five-Year Study on Treatment Changes in Hypoglycemia-Associated Medications: Towards Personalized Diabetes Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Demographic Mix of Care Homes and Personalised Use of SGLT-2 Inhibitors and GLP-1RAs in Residents with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in Older Adults with Diabetes: A Qualitative Analysis of Phase 4 ClinicalTrials.gov Studies.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- A novel nomogram based on HALP score for predicting time to glycemic stability in hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Insulin use in diabetes association with cognitive impairment and dementia incidence.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Medication Adherence and Glycemic Control among American Indian/Alaska Native Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Within a Commercial Health Care System: A System-Wide Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Implementation and evaluation of clinical pharmacy services in elderly outpatients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a single-center experience from Vietnam.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Hypoglycaemia in Older Adults with Diabetes: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Personalized Care in an Aging Population.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThere is substantial uncertainty about optimal glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBSERVATIONS: Four large randomized clinical trials (RCTs), ranging in size from 1791 to 11,440 patients, provide the majority of the evidence used to guide diabetes therapy. Most RCTs of intensive vs standard glycemic control excluded adults older than 80 years, used surrogate end points to evaluate microvascular outcomes and provided limited data on which subgroups are most likely to benefit or be harmed by specific therapies. Available data from randomized clinical trials suggest that intensive glycemic control does not reduce major macrovascular events in older adults for at least 10 years. Furthermore, intensive glycemic control does not lead to improved patient-centered microvascular outcomes for at least 8 years. Data from randomized clinical trials consistently suggest that intensive glycemic control immediately increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia 1.5- to 3-fold. Based on these data and observational studies, for the majority of adults older than 65 years, the harms associated with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target lower than 7.5% or higher than 9% are likely to outweigh the benefits. However, the optimal target depends on patient factors, medications used to reach the target, life expectancy, and patient preferences about treatment. If only medications with low treatment burden and hypoglycemia risk (such as metformin) are required, a lower HbA1c target may be appropriate. If patients strongly prefer to avoid injections or frequent fingerstick monitoring, a higher HbA1c target that obviates the need for insulin may be appropriate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High-quality evidence about glycemic treatment in older adults is lacking. Optimal decisions need to be made collaboratively with patients, incorporating the likelihood of benefits and harms and patient preferences about treatment and treatment burden. For the majority of older adults, an HbA1c target between 7.5% and 9% will maximize benefits and minimize harms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.