Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26954412›Full record

ReviewJAMA2016

Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient: A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

Kasia J Lipska, Harlan Krumholz, Tacara Soones, Sei J Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01954771 (A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study on Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose), which is not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
37.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01954771 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study on Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Protocols in Predicting Glucose Levels in Senior Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Anzhen HospitalRan2013 to 2016Enrolled89ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Coronary Artery DiseaseArmsSMBG, CGMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kasia J LipskaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Harlan KrumholzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut3Section of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut4Department of.
Tacara SoonesDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York.
Sei J LeeDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco7San Francisco VA Medical Center, California.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USYale New Haven Hospital · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Predicting Severe Hypoglycemia among Older Adults with DiabetesK23AG048359 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSKA, KASIA JOANNA · 2014 to 2018
$778k
Individualizing Treatment for Nursing Home Residents with Diabetes MellitusK23AG040779 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEE, SEI · 2011 to 2013
$526k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG040779NIA NIH HHS K23AG040779NIA NIH HHS K23 AG048359NIA NIH HHS K23AG048359NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThere is substantial uncertainty about optimal glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBSERVATIONS: Four large randomized clinical trials (RCTs), ranging in size from 1791 to 11,440 patients, provide the majority of the evidence used to guide diabetes therapy. Most RCTs of intensive vs standard glycemic control excluded adults older than 80 years, used surrogate end points to evaluate microvascular outcomes and provided limited data on which subgroups are most likely to benefit or be harmed by specific therapies. Available data from randomized clinical trials suggest that intensive glycemic control does not reduce major macrovascular events in older adults for at least 10 years. Furthermore, intensive glycemic control does not lead to improved patient-centered microvascular outcomes for at least 8 years. Data from randomized clinical trials consistently suggest that intensive glycemic control immediately increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia 1.5- to 3-fold. Based on these data and observational studies, for the majority of adults older than 65 years, the harms associated with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target lower than 7.5% or higher than 9% are likely to outweigh the benefits. However, the optimal target depends on patient factors, medications used to reach the target, life expectancy, and patient preferences about treatment. If only medications with low treatment burden and hypoglycemia risk (such as metformin) are required, a lower HbA1c target may be appropriate. If patients strongly prefer to avoid injections or frequent fingerstick monitoring, a higher HbA1c target that obviates the need for insulin may be appropriate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High-quality evidence about glycemic treatment in older adults is lacking. Optimal decisions need to be made collaboratively with patients, incorporating the likelihood of benefits and harms and patient preferences about treatment and treatment burden. For the majority of older adults, an HbA1c target between 7.5% and 9% will maximize benefits and minimize harms.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsLife ExpectancyMaleObservational Studies as TopicPatient PreferenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26954412
PMCPMC4823136
OpenAlexW2295084748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.