Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26953636›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2016

Towards a Neuronal Gauge Theory.

Biswa Sengupta, Arturo Tozzi, Gerald K Cooray, Pamela K Douglas, Karl J Friston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Why Should Natural Principles Be Simple?Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel) · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2021
    Review
  16. Active listening.Hearing research · 2021
    Article
  17. The thermodynamics of cognition: A mathematical treatment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Active inference on discrete state-spaces: A synthesis.Journal of mathematical psychology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Biswa SenguptaWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Arturo TozziCenter for Nonlinear Science, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, United States of America.
Gerald K CoorayClinical Neurophysiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pamela K DouglasLINT Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles California, United States of America.
Karl J FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088130/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the amount of knowledge and data accruing in the neurosciences, is it time to formulate a general principle for neuronal dynamics that holds at evolutionary, developmental, and perceptual timescales? In this paper, we propose that the brain (and other self-organised biological systems) can be characterised via the mathematical apparatus of a gauge theory. The picture that emerges from this approach suggests that any biological system (from a neuron to an organism) can be cast as resolving uncertainty about its external milieu, either by changing its internal states or its relationship to the environment. Using formal arguments, we show that a gauge theory for neuronal dynamics--based on approximate Bayesian inference--has the potential to shed new light on phenomena that have thus far eluded a formal description, such as attention and the link between action and perception.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBayes TheoremBrainFeedback, SensoryNeurons

Identifiers

PMID26953636
PMCPMC4783098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.