Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26953217›Full record

Observational studyChest2016

Feasibility, Utility, and Safety of Midodrine During Recovery Phase From Septic Shock.

Micah R Whitson, Edwin Mo, Tasnima Nabi, Lauren Healy, Seth Koenig, Mangala Narasimhan, Paul H Mayo

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Chest, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02771158 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Midodrine During Recovery Phase From Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwell HealthRan2017 to 2017Enrolled0ConditionsHypotension, Shock, Septic, SepsisArmsMidodrine, placebo
NCT03911817 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Midodrine Administration on the Clinical Outcome of Septic Shock Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsMidodrine
NCT04440085 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Randomized case-controlled trial assessing midodrine (gutron®) in postoperative vasoplegic patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorBürgerspital SolothurnRan2020 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsVasoplegic Syndrome, Sirs Due to Noninfectious Process Without Organ Dysfunction, Orthostatic HypotensionArmsMidodrine Hydrochloride, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Midodrine use in critically ill patients: a narrative review.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Micah R WhitsonDepartment of Emergency/Internal/Critical Care Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, NY. Electronic address: micahwhitson64@gmail.com.
Edwin MoDepartment of Emergency/Internal/Critical Care Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, NY.
Tasnima NabiDepartment of Pharmacy, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, NY.
Lauren HealyDepartment of Pharmacy, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, NY.
Seth KoenigDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, NY.
Mangala NarasimhanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, NY.
Paul H MayoDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, NY.
Northwell Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe describe the feasibility, utility, and safety of oral midodrine to replace IV vasopressors during recovery from septic shock.

methodsThis was a retrospective study performed in a medical ICU. All study subjects had a diagnosis of septic shock requiring at least 24 hours of IV vasopressors and demonstrated clinical stability with stable or decreasing doses of IV vasopressors. The two groups compared were those who received IV vasopressors only and those who received IV vasopressors with adjunctive midodrine.

resultsOf the 275 study patients, 140 received an IV vasopressor only and 135 received midodrine in addition to an IV vasopressor. There was no difference between the groups' demographics (age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 4 score). Mean IV vasopressor duration was 3.8 days in the IV vasopressor only group and 2.9 days in the IV vasopressor with midodrine group (P < .001). An IV vasopressor was reinstituted after discontinuation in 21 of 140 (15%) patients in the IV vasopressor only group and in 7 of 135 (5.2%) patients in the IV vasopressor with midodrine group (P = .007). ICU length of stay was 9.4 days in the IV vasopressor only group and 7.5 days in the IV vasopressor with midodrine group (P = .017). There were no complications associated with midodrine use except transient bradycardia in one patient, which resolved upon discontinuation of midodrine.

conclusionsMidodrine may reduce the duration of IV vasopressors during recovery phase from septic shock and may be associated with a reduction in length of stay in the ICU.

Indexed as

MidodrineShock, SepticVasoconstrictor AgentsAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug MonitoringDrug SubstitutionFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesMidodrineVasoconstrictor Agentscritical carehypotensionmidodrinesepsisshock

Identifiers

PMID26953217
OpenAlexW2292437155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.