Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26952717›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2016

Treatment of prescription opioid disorders in Canada: looking at the 'other epidemic'?

Benedikt Fischer, Paul Kurdyak, Elliot Goldner, Mark Tyndall, Jürgen Rehm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quality of primary care among individuals receiving treatment for opioid use disorder.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The opioid crisis: past, present and future policy climate in Ontario, Canada.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2017
    Article
  10. Zoning out methadone and rising opioid-related deaths in Ontario: Reforms and municipal government actions.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effective Canadian policy to reduce harms from prescription opioids: learning from past failures.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benedikt FischerSocial and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction & Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada. bfischer@sfu.ca.
Paul KurdyakSocial and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction & Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada. paul.kurdyak@camh.ca.
Elliot GoldnerCentre for Applied Research in Mental Health & Addiction (CARMHA), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, V6B 5K3, Canada. egoldner@sfu.ca.
Mark TyndallB.C. Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC), Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada. mtyndall@bccdc.ca.
Jürgen RehmSocial and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction & Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada. jtrehm@gmail.com.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CABC Centre for Disease Control · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnitude and consequences of prescription opioid (PO) misuse and harms (including rising demand for PO disorder treatment) in Canada have been well-documented. Despite a limited evidence-base for PO dependence treatment, opioid maintenance therapy (OMT) - mostly by means of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) - has become the de facto first-line treatment for PO-disorders. For example in the most populous province of Ontario, some 50,000 patients - large proportions of them young adults - are enrolled in MMT, resulting in a MMT-rate that is 3-4 times higher than that of the United States. MMT in Ontario has widely proliferated towards a quasi-treatment industry within a system context of the public fee-payer offering generous incentives for community-based MMT providers. Contrary to the proliferation of MMT, there has been no commensurate increase in availability of alternative (e.g., detox, tapering, behavioral), and less intrusive and/or costly, treatments which may provide therapeutic benefits at least for sub-sets of PO-dependent patients. Given the extensive PO-dependence burden combined with its distinct socio-demographic and clinical profile (e.g., involving many young people, less intensive or risky opioid use), an evidence-based 'stepped-care' model for PO dependence treatment ought to be developed in Canada where MMT constitutes one, but likely a last resort or option, for treatment. Other, less intrusive treatment options as well as the best mix of treatment options should be systematically investigated and implemented. This case study has relevance and implications for evidence-based treatment also for the increasing number of other jurisdictions where PO misuse and disorders have been rising.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementEvidence-Based MedicineAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedOntarioOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrescription Drug MisuseYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidMethadone

Identifiers

PMID26952717
PMCPMC4782364
OpenAlexW2297104230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.