Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26952213›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Resistome diversity in cattle and the environment decreases during beef production.

Noelle R Noyes, Xiang Yang, Lyndsey M Linke, Roberta J Magnuson, Adam Dettenwanger, Shaun Cook, Ifigenia Geornaras, Dale E Woerner, Sheryl P Gow, Tim A McAllister and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From farm to factory to fork.Nature microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Noelle R NoyesDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-1008
Xiang YangDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Lyndsey M LinkeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Roberta J MagnusonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Adam DettenwangerDepartment of Computer Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Shaun CookAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, Canada.
Ifigenia GeornarasDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Dale E WoernerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Sheryl P GowCentre for Food-borne, Environmental Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, University of Saskatoon, Saskatoon, Canada.
Tim A McAllisterAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, Canada.
Hua YangDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Jaime RuizDepartment of Computer Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Kenneth L JonesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, United States.
Christina A BoucherDepartment of Computer Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Paul S MorleyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.
Keith E BelkDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States.

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Veterinary Pre-Doctoral Research Scholars ProgramT32OD012201 · OD · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VANDEWOUDE, SUE · 2013 to 2019
$795k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIH HHS T32 OD012201NIH HHS T32OD012201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistant determinants (ARDs) can be transmitted from livestock systems through meat products or environmental effluents. The public health risk posed by these two routes is not well understood, particularly in non-pathogenic bacteria. We collected pooled samples from 8 groups of 1741 commercial cattle as they moved through the process of beef production from feedlot entry through slaughter. We recorded antimicrobial drug exposures and interrogated the resistome at points in production when management procedures could potentially influence ARD abundance and/or transmission. Over 300 unique ARDs were identified. Resistome diversity decreased while cattle were in the feedlot, indicating selective pressure. ARDs were not identified in beef products, suggesting that slaughter interventions may reduce the risk of transmission of ARDs to beef consumers. This report highlights the utility and limitations of metagenomics for assessing public health risks regarding antimicrobial resistance, and demonstrates that environmental pathways may represent a greater risk than the food supply.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialEnvironmental MicrobiologyAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCattleFecesLongitudinal StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsagricultureantimicrobial resistanceepidemiologyfeedlotsglobal healthinfectious diseasemicrobiologymicrobiomepublic healthresistome

Identifiers

PMID26952213
PMCPMC4798965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.