Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26951777›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks.

Helen Elden, Henrik Hagberg, Anna Wessberg, Verena Sengpiel, Andreas Herbst, Maria Bullarbo, Christina Bergh, Kristian Bolin, Snezana Malbasic, Sissel Saltvedt and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Swedish Pregnancy Register - for quality of care improvement and research.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Helen EldenGothenburg University, Institute of Health and Caring Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, S-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. helen.elden@gu.se.
Henrik HagbergGothenburg University, Perinatal centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, East, S-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anna WessbergGothenburg University, Institute of Health and Caring Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, S-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Verena SengpielGothenburg University, Perinatal centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, East, S-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Andreas HerbstSkane University Hospital, S-214 28, Malmo, Sweden.
Maria BullarboGothenburg University, Perinatal centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, East, S-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christina BerghGothenburg University, Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kristian BolinGothenburg University, Department of Economics and Statistics, School Business, Economics and Law, P.O. Box 640, S-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Snezana MalbasicSouth Alvsborg County Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S- 501 82, Boras, Sweden.
Sissel SaltvedtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olof StephanssonClinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institute, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna-Karin WikströmUppsala University, Women's and Children's Health, Akademiska Hospital, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lars LadforsGothenburg University, Perinatal centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, East, S-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulla-Britt WennerholmGothenburg University, Perinatal centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, East, S-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational data shows that postterm pregnancy (≥42 gestational weeks, GW) and late term pregnancy (≥41 GW), as compared to term pregnancy, is associated with an increased risk for adverse outcome for the mother and infant. Standard care in many countries is induction of labour at 42 GW. There is insufficient scientific support that induction of labour at 41 GW, as compared with expectant management and induction at 42 GW will reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity without an increase in operative deliveries, negative delivery experiences or higher costs. Large randomised studies are needed since important outcomes; such as perinatal mortality and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy are rare events. METHODS/

designA total of 10 038 healthy women ≥18 years old with a normal live singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at 41 GW estimated with a first or second trimester ultrasound, who is able to understand oral and written information will be randomised to labour induction at 41 GW (early induction) or expectant management and induction at 42 GW (late induction). Women will be recruited at university clinics and county hospitals in Sweden comprising more than 65 000 deliveries per year. Primary outcome will be a composite of stillbirth, neonatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcomes will be other adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes, mode of delivery, women's experience, cost effectiveness and infant morbidity up to 3 months of age. Data on background variables, obstetric and neonatal outcomes will be obtained from the Swedish Pregnancy Register and the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Data on women's experiences will be collected by questionnaires after randomisation and 3 months after delivery. Primary analysis will be intention to treat. The statistician will be blinded to group and intervention. DISCUSSION: It is important to investigate if an intervention at 41 GW is superior to standard care in order to reduce death and lifelong disability for the children. The pregnant population, >41 GW, constitutes 15-20% of all pregnancies and the results of the study will thus have a great impact. The use of registries for randomisation and collection of outcome data represents a unique and new study design.

trial registrationThe study was registered in Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN26113652 the 30(th) of March 2015 (DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN26113652 ).

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricPregnancy, ProlongedAdultClinical ProtocolsDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesLabor, InducedPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRegistries

Identifiers

PMID26951777
PMCPMC4782290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.