Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26951678›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

ppGpp negatively impacts ribosome assembly affecting growth and antimicrobial tolerance in Gram-positive bacteria.

Rebecca M Corrigan, Lauren E Bellows, Alison Wood, Angelika Gründling

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Basis of Persister Awakening and Lag-Phase Recovery inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  16. HflX mediates rifampicin resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. DNA aptamer AptScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca M CorriganDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; a.grundling@imperial.ac.uk r.corrigan@sheffield.ac.uk.
Lauren E BellowsSection of Microbiology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Alison WoodDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom;
Angelika GründlingSection of Microbiology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom a.grundling@imperial.ac.uk r.corrigan@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6235-8687
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

European Research Council 260371Medical Research Council MR/J006874/1Wellcome Trust 100289Wellcome Trust 104110/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stringent response is a survival mechanism used by bacteria to deal with stress. It is coordinated by the nucleotides guanosine tetraphosphate and pentaphosphate [(p)ppGpp], which interact with target proteins to promote bacterial survival. Although this response has been well characterized in proteobacteria, very little is known about the effectors of this signaling system in Gram-positive species. Here, we report on the identification of seven target proteins for the stringent response nucleotides in the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus We demonstrate that the GTP synthesis enzymes HprT and Gmk bind with a high affinity, leading to an inhibition of GTP production. In addition, we identified five putative GTPases--RsgA, RbgA, Era, HflX, and ObgE--as (p)ppGpp target proteins. We show that RsgA, RbgA, Era, and HflX are functional GTPases and that their activity is promoted in the presence of ribosomes but strongly inhibited by the stringent response nucleotides. By characterizing the function of RsgA in vivo, we ascertain that this protein is involved in ribosome assembly, with an rsgA deletion strain, or a strain inactivated for GTPase activity, displaying decreased growth, a decrease in the amount of mature 70S ribosomes, and an increased level of tolerance to antimicrobials. We additionally demonstrate that the interaction of ppGpp with cellular GTPases is not unique to the staphylococci, as homologs from Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecalis retain this ability. Taken together, this study reveals ribosome inactivation as a previously unidentified mechanism through which the stringent response functions in Gram-positive bacteria.

Indexed as

Organelle BiogenesisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterococcus faecalisEscherichia coliGene LibraryGTP PhosphohydrolasesGuanosine TetraphosphateGuanosine TriphosphateHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOpen Reading FramesProtein BindingRibosomesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsGTP PhosphohydrolasesGuanosine TetraphosphateGuanosine TriphosphateppGppribosomeStaphylococcus aureusstringent responsetolerance

Identifiers

PMID26951678
PMCPMC4812758
OpenAlexW2298446567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.