Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26951287›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2016

A Comparison of Health Plan- and Provider-Delivered Chronic Care Management Models on Patient Clinical Outcomes.

Zhehui Luo, Qiaoling Chen, Ann M Annis, Gretchen Piatt, Lee A Green, Min Tao, Jodi Summers Holtrop

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Patient perception matters in weight management.Primary health care research & development · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Getting from Intention to Action.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhehui LuoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. zluo@msu.edu.
Qiaoling ChenDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Sourthen California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Ann M AnnisVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Gretchen PiattDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lee A GreenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Min TaoClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jodi Summers HoltropDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado , Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Implementing Sustainable Diabetes Prevention and Self-Management in Primary CareR18DK082377 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HOLTROP, JODI SUMMERS · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
A Comparison of Provider Versus Health Plan Delivered Care Management in MichiganR18HS020108 · AHRQ · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOLTROP, JODI SUMMERS · 2010 to 2010
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS020108NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK082377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe real world implementation of chronic care management model varies greatly. One aspect of this variation is the delivery mode. Two contrasting strategies include provider-delivered care management (PDCM) and health plan-delivered care management (HPDCM).

objectiveWe aimed to compare the effectiveness of PDCM vs. HPDCM on improving clinical outcomes for patients with chronic diseases.

designWe used a quasi-experimental two-group pre-post design using the difference-in-differences method. PATIENTS: Commercially insured patients, with any of the five chronic diseases-congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, diabetes, or asthma, who were outreached to and engaged in either PDCM or HPDCM were included in the study. MAIN MEASURES: Outreached patients were those who received an attempted or actual contact for enrollment in care management; and engaged patients were those who had one or more care management sessions/encounters with a care manager. Effectiveness measures included blood pressure, low density lipoprotein (LDL), weight loss, and hemoglobin A1c (for diabetic patients only). Primary endpoints were evaluated in the first year of follow-up. KEY

resultsA total of 4,000 patients were clustered in 165 practices (31 in PDCM and 134 in HPDCM). The PDCM approach demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the proportion of outreached patients whose LDL was under control: the proportion of patients with LDL < 100 mg/dL increased by 3 % for the PDCM group (95 % CI: 1 % to 6 %) and 1 % for the HPDCM group (95 % CI: -2 % to 5 %). However, the 2 % difference in these improvements was not statistically significant (95 % CI: -2 % to 6 %). The HPDCM approach showed 3 % [95 % CI: 2 % to 6 %] improvement in overall diabetes care among outreached patients and significant reduction in obesity rates compared to PDCM (4 %, 95 % CI: 0.3 % to 8 %).

conclusionsBoth care management delivery modes may be viable options for improving care for patients with chronic diseases. In this commercially insured population, neither PDCM nor HPDCM resulted in substantial improvement in patients' clinical indicators in the first year. Different care management strategies within the provider-delivered programs need further investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleManaged Care ProgramsMiddle AgedNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareSelf-Managementcare managementchronic Diseasecomparative effectivenessprimary Care

Identifiers

PMID26951287
PMCPMC4907946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.