Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26951233›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2016

Good Signal Detection Practices: Evidence from IMI PROTECT.

Antoni F Z Wisniewski, Andrew Bate, Cedric Bousquet, Andreas Brueckner, Gianmario Candore, Kristina Juhlin, Miguel A Macia-Martinez, Katrin Manlik, Naashika Quarcoo, Suzie Seabroke and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Antoni F Z WisniewskiAstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK. antoni.wisniewski@astrazeneca.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0536-5514
Andrew BatePfizer, Walton-on-the-Hill, Surrey, UK.
Cedric BousquetINSERM, UMR_S1142, LIMICS, Paris, France.
Andreas BruecknerNovartis, Basel, Switzerland.
Gianmario CandoreEuropean Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Kristina JuhlinUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Miguel A Macia-MartinezAgencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, Madrid, Spain.
Katrin ManlikBayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.
Naashika QuarcooGlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
Suzie SeabrokeMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Jim SlatteryEuropean Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Harry SouthworthData Clarity Consulting, Stockport, UK.
Bharat ThakrarF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Phil TregunnoMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Lionel Van HolleGlaxoSmithKline, Wavre, Belgium.
Michael KayserBayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany.
G Niklas NorénUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over a period of 5 years, the Innovative Medicines Initiative PROTECT (Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium) project has addressed key research questions relevant to the science of safety signal detection. The results of studies conducted into quantitative signal detection in spontaneous reporting, clinical trial and electronic health records databases are summarised and 39 recommendations have been formulated, many based on comparative analyses across a range of databases (e.g. regulatory, pharmaceutical company). The recommendations point to pragmatic steps that those working in the pharmacovigilance community can take to improve signal detection practices, whether in a national or international agency or in a pharmaceutical company setting. PROTECT has also pointed to areas of potentially fruitful future research and some areas where further effort is likely to yield less.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEuropeHumansPharmacovigilanceQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID26951233
PMCPMC4871909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.