Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26951136›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2016

A single dose of meropenem is superior to ciprofloxacin in preventing infections after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies in the era of quinolone resistance.

Michael Samarinas, Konstantinos Dimitropoulos, Ioannis Zachos, Stavros Gravas, Anastasios Karatzas, Vasileios Tzortzis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael SamarinasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110, Mezourlo, Larissa, Greece. mikesamih@hotmail.com.
Konstantinos DimitropoulosDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110, Mezourlo, Larissa, Greece.
Ioannis ZachosDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110, Mezourlo, Larissa, Greece.
Stavros GravasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110, Mezourlo, Larissa, Greece.
Anastasios KaratzasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110, Mezourlo, Larissa, Greece.
Vasileios TzortzisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110, Mezourlo, Larissa, Greece.
University Hospital of Larissa · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of meropenem single dose before transrectal prostate biopsy, instead of ciprofloxacin in the era of fluoroquinolones resistance.

methodsThis prospective study included patients with indications for prostatic biopsy from January to December 2014. Those with known resistance in fluoroquinolones or meropenem or with decreased creatinine clearance were excluded. Patients were randomized into two groups, and statistical analysis was carried out. Group A received a 3-day course of ciprofloxacin 500 bid per os starting the day before biopsy. Group B received 1 g meropenem intravenously 1 h prior to the procedure. Patients were followed up for 15 days, and those with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and fever were called for hospitalization. Urine and blood cultures were obtained.

resultsA total of 110 patients, 52-75 years old (mean 67.5, median 66) participated in the study, allocated in Groups A and B. After the procedure, 18 patients (32.7 %) of Group A reported macroscopic hematuria, while 10 (18.2 %) reported rectal blood loss. Nine patients (16.3 %) presented because of fever and LUTS. One of them developed septic shock and died in the ICU. Cultures revealed multi-resistant E. coli with high sensitivity to meropenem, and patients were treated accordingly. In Group B, 20 (36.3 %) patients presented with macroscopic hematuria and 9 (16.3 %) with rectal blood loss. One patient returned to hospital with LUTS and fever. Cultures revealed Klebsiella pneumoniae sensitive to colimycine.

conclusionsA single dose of meropenem prior to prostate biopsy is a safe and effective way to avoid the possible infectious complications in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisBiopsy, NeedleCiprofloxacinDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndosonographyEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMeropenemMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinMeropenemThienamycinsFluoroquinolones resistanceInfectious complicationsMeropenemTransrectal prostate biopsy

Identifiers

PMID26951136
OpenAlexW2295214534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.