Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26951106›Full record

ArticleJournal of physiological anthropology2016

Associations of anthropometric measures on breast cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal women--a case-control study.

Renata Pacholczak, Wiesława Klimek-Piotrowska, Piotr Kuszmiersz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physiological anthropology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A review of menopause nomenclature.Reproductive health · 2022
    Review
  8. Phase Angle as a Marker of Muscular Strength in Breast Cancer Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renata PacholczakDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Kopernika 12, 31-034, Cracow, Poland. renata.pacholczak@gmail.com.
Wiesława Klimek-PiotrowskaDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Kopernika 12, 31-034, Cracow, Poland. wkpiotrowska@gmail.com.
Piotr KuszmierszDepartment of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Kopernika 12, 31-034, Cracow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe type of silhouette and quantity of fat tissue are correlated with hormonal imbalance which plays a substantial role in breast carcinogenesis. The goal of the study was to investigate the association between various anthropometric characteristics and breast cancer risk.

methodsDetailed anthropometric assessment was conducted on 487 women of whom 193 had diagnosed breast cancer and were consecutive patients in the Oncology Center, Cracow, Poland between 2002 and 2004. Measurements were divided into four categories: overall body size (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference [WC], waist-hip ratio [WHR]), regional body sizes (skinfold thicknesses, circumferences), thickness of the skeleton (widths, chest diameters), and body proportions. Additionally, results were analyzed in regard to menopausal status. Differences between groups were assessed using Student's t test and Mann-Whitney's test. Models of logistic regression for selected data were built to estimate the odds ratio. Results were considered statistically significant when the P value was less than 0.05.

resultsThe BMI in both groups was negatively associated with the risk of cancer. Among premenopausal women, WHR increased the risk of breast cancer (WHR > 0.83, OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.01-7.27). Anthropometric indices of hip-to-shoulder ratio in postmenopausal (≥84.2 mm, OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.11) and trunk-to-height ratio in both premenopausal women (≥32.76, OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03-0.28) and postmenopausal women (≥32.76, OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.33) were strongly related to a decreased risk of breast cancer. Thicknesses of the triceps and subscapular skinfolds increased the risk of breast cancer.

conclusionsWomen with breast cancer present with an obese type of silhouette with a specific concentration of fat tissue in the central and upper parts of the body.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody Mass IndexBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObesityOdds RatioPolandPostmenopauseRisk FactorsWaist-Hip Ratio

Identifiers

PMID26951106
PMCPMC4782382
OpenAlexW2305185122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.