ArticleTransplantation2017
Predicting Cellular Rejection With a Cell-Based Assay: Preclinical Evaluation in Children.
Article in Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and predictive biomarkers of acute rejection after liver transplantation.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Review
- Enhanced Donor Antigen Presentation by B Cells Predicts Acute Cellular Rejection and Late Outcomes After Transplantation.Transplantation direct · 2024Article
- Impaired Cellular and Antibody immunity after COVID-19 in Chronically Immunosuppressed Transplant Recipients.Journal of surgery and research · 2023Article
- The Role of Dynamic DNA Methylation in Liver Transplant Rejection in Children.Transplantation direct · 2022Article
- Immunosuppression Regimens for Intestinal Transplantation in Children.Paediatric drugs · 2022Review
- A network-based approach to identify expression modules underlying rejection in pediatric liver transplantation.Cell reports. Medicine · 2022Article
- Immune cell function assays in the diagnosis of infection in pediatric liver transplantation: an open-labeled, two center prospective cohort study.Translational pediatrics · 2021Article
- Operational tolerance in intestinal transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021Article
- Renal allograft surveillance with allospecific T-cytotoxic memory cells.Renal failure · 2020Article
- Applicability, safety, and biological activity of regulatory T cell therapy in liver transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020Article
- Exosome-derived galectin-9 may be a novel predictor of rejection and prognosis after liver transplantation.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2019Article
- Long-Term Signs of T Cell and Myeloid Cell Activation After Intestinal Transplantation With Cellular Rejections Contributing to Further Increase of CD16Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- Predictive Value of Indocyanine Green Plasma Disappearance Rate on Liver Function and Complications After Liver Transplantation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Profile of the Pleximmune blood test for transplant rejection risk prediction.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAllospecific CD154+T-cytotoxic memory cells (CD154+TcM) predict acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation (LTx) or intestine transplantation (ITx) in small cohorts of children and can enhance immunosuppression management, but await validation and clinical implementation.
methodsTo establish safety and probable benefit, CD154+TcM were measured in cryopreserved samples from 214 children younger than 21 years (National Clinical Trial 1163578). Training set samples (n = 158) were tested with research-grade reagents and 122 independent validation set samples were tested with current good manufacturing practices-manufactured reagents after assay standardization and reproducibility testing. Recipient CD154+TcM induced by stimulation with donor cells were expressed as a fraction of those induced by HLA nonidentical cells in parallel cultures. The resulting immunoreactivity index (IR) if greater than 1 implies increased rejection-risk.
resultsTraining and validation set subjects were demographically similar. Mean coefficient of test variation was less than 10% under several conditions. Logistic regression incorporating several confounding variables identified separate pretransplant and posttransplant IR thresholds for prediction of rejection in the respective training set samples. An IR of 1.1 or greater in posttransplant training samples and IR of 1.23 or greater in pretransplant training samples predicted LTx or ITx rejection in corresponding validation set samples in the 60-day postsampling period with sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 84%, 80%, 64%, and 92%, respectively (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.792), and 57%, 89%, 78%, and 74%, respectively (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.848). No adverse events were encountered due to phlebotomy.
conclusionsAllospecific CD154+T-cytotoxic memory cells predict acute cellular rejection after LTx or ITx in children. Adjunctive use can enhance clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.