Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26950603›Full record

ArticleNature2016

Crystal structure of a substrate-engaged SecY protein-translocation channel.

Long Li, Eunyong Park, JingJing Ling, Jessica Ingram, Hidde Ploegh, Tom A Rapoport

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A unifying model for membrane protein biogenesis.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. EMC rectifies the topology of multipass membrane proteins.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Long Li *Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Harvard Medical School, Department of Cell Biology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Eunyong Park *Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Harvard Medical School, Department of Cell Biology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
JingJing LingWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Jessica IngramWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Hidde PloeghWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Tom A RapoportHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Harvard Medical School, Department of Cell Biology, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

PROTEIN TRANSPORT INTO MAMMALIAN ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUMR01GM052586 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Tom A Rapoport · 1995 to 2026
$11.9M
A new strategy to disrupt protein-protein interactions in eukaryotic cells.DP1GM106409 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI PLOEGH, HIDDE L. · 2012 to 2016
$4.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS DP1 GM106409NIGMS NIH HHS GM052586NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrophobic signal sequences target secretory polypeptides to a protein-conducting channel formed by a heterotrimeric membrane protein complex, the prokaryotic SecY or eukaryotic Sec61 complex. How signal sequences are recognized is poorly understood, particularly because they are diverse in sequence and length. Structures of the inactive channel show that the largest subunit, SecY or Sec61α, consists of two halves that form an hourglass-shaped pore with a constriction in the middle of the membrane and a lateral gate that faces lipid. The cytoplasmic funnel is empty, while the extracellular funnel is filled with a plug domain. In bacteria, the SecY channel associates with the translating ribosome in co-translational translocation, and with the SecA ATPase in post-translational translocation. How a translocating polypeptide inserts into the channel is uncertain, as cryo-electron microscopy structures of the active channel have a relatively low resolution (~10 Å) or are of insufficient quality. Here we report a crystal structure of the active channel, assembled from SecY complex, the SecA ATPase, and a segment of a secretory protein fused into SecA. The translocating protein segment inserts into the channel as a loop, displacing the plug domain. The hydrophobic core of the signal sequence forms a helix that sits in a groove outside the lateral gate, while the following polypeptide segment intercalates into the gate. The carboxy (C)-terminal section of the polypeptide loop is located in the channel, surrounded by residues of the pore ring. Thus, during translocation, the hydrophobic segments of signal sequences, and probably bilayer-spanning domains of nascent membrane proteins, exit the lateral gate and dock at a specific site that faces the lipid phase.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLipid BilayersMembrane Transport ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein Sorting SignalsProtein Structure, TertiarySecA ProteinsSEC Translocation ChannelsAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsLipid BilayersMembrane Transport ProteinsProtein Sorting SignalsSecA ProteinsSEC Translocation Channels

Identifiers

PMID26950603
PMCPMC4855518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.