Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26950417›Full record

ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2016

Self-DNA inhibitory effects: Underlying mechanisms and ecological implications.

Fabrizio Cartenì, Giuliano Bonanomi, Francesco Giannino, Guido Incerti, Christian Ernest Vincenot, Maria Luisa Chiusano, Stefano Mazzoleni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Self-DNA Early Exposure in Cultivated and WeedyPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabrizio Cartenìa Dipartimento di Agraria , University of Naples Federico II , via Università 100, Portici ( NA ), Italy.
Giuliano Bonanomia Dipartimento di Agraria , University of Naples Federico II , via Università 100, Portici ( NA ), Italy.
Francesco Gianninoa Dipartimento di Agraria , University of Naples Federico II , via Università 100, Portici ( NA ), Italy.
Guido Incertia Dipartimento di Agraria , University of Naples Federico II , via Università 100, Portici ( NA ), Italy.
Christian Ernest Vincenotb Department of Social Informatics , Kyoto University , Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto , Japan.
Maria Luisa Chiusanoa Dipartimento di Agraria , University of Naples Federico II , via Università 100, Portici ( NA ), Italy.
Stefano Mazzolenia Dipartimento di Agraria , University of Naples Federico II , via Università 100, Portici ( NA ), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA is usually known as the molecule that carries the instructions necessary for cell functioning and genetic inheritance. A recent discovery reported a new functional role for extracellular DNA. After fragmentation, either by natural or artificial decomposition, small DNA molecules (between ∼50 and ∼2000 bp) exert a species specific inhibitory effect on individuals of the same species. Evidence shows that such effect occurs for a wide range of organisms, suggesting a general biological process. In this paper we explore the possible molecular mechanisms behind those findings and discuss the ecological implications, specifically those related to plant species coexistence.

Indexed as

EcosystemDNA, PlantFeedbackPlantsSoilDNA, PlantSoilAutotoxicityextracellular DNAlitter decompositionplant-soil negative feedbackspecies interactions

Identifiers

PMID26950417
PMCPMC4883922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.