Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26950275›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2017

Angiogenesis in NSCLC: is vessel co-option the trunk that sustains the branches?

Ana Luísa Coelho, Mónica Patrícia Gomes, Raquel Jorge Catarino, Christian Rolfo, Agostinho Marques Lopes, Rui Manuel Medeiros, António Manuel Araújo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Angiopoietin-2 associates with poor prognosis in Moyamoya angiopathy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Luísa CoelhoInstituto Português de Oncologia, Molecular Oncology Group, Porto, Portugal.
Mónica Patrícia GomesInstituto Português de Oncologia, Molecular Oncology Group, Porto, Portugal.
Raquel Jorge CatarinoInstituto Português de Oncologia, Molecular Oncology Group, Porto, Portugal.
Christian RolfoPhase I, Early Clinical Trials Unit, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Agostinho Marques LopesFaculdade de Medicina, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rui Manuel MedeirosInstituto Português de Oncologia, Molecular Oncology Group, Porto, Portugal.
António Manuel AraújoInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTAntwerp University Hospital · BELiga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The critical role of angiogenesis in tumor development makes its inhibition a valuable new approach in therapy, rapidly making anti-angiogenesis a major focus in research. While the VEGF/VEGFR pathway is the main target of the approved anti-angiogenic molecules in NSCLC treatment, the results obtained are still modest, especially due to resistance mechanisms. Accumulating scientific data show that vessel co-option is an alternative mechanism to angiogenesis during tumor development in well-vascularized organs such as the lungs, where tumor cells highjack the existing vasculature to obtain its blood supply in a non-angiogenic fashion. This can explain the low/lack of response to current anti-angiogenic strategies. The same principle applies to lung metastases of other primary tumors. The exact mechanisms of vessel co-option need to be further elucidated, but it is known that the co-opted vessels regress by the action of Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), a vessel destabilizing cytokine expressed by the endothelial cells of the pre-existing mature vessels. In the absence of VEGF, vessel regression leads to tumor cell loss and hypoxia, with a subsequent switch to a neoangiogenic phenotype by the remaining tumor cells. Unravelling the vessel co-option mechanisms and involved players may be fruitful for numerous reasons, and the particularities of this form of vascularization should be carefully considered when planning anti-angiogenic interventions or designing clinical trials for this purpose. In view of the current knowledge, rationale for therapeutic approaches of dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF are swiftly gaining strength and may serve as a launchpad to more successful NSCLC anti-vascular treatments.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLung NeoplasmsNeovascularization, Pathologicangiogenesisangiopoietin-2anti-angiogenic strategiesNSCLCvessel co-option

Identifiers

PMID26950275
PMCPMC5503654
OpenAlexW2288373908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.